Kenneth Warren wrote:For years people have been talking about marketing Lakewood.
I propose as an experiment that a "Lakewood Marketing Consortium" with Lakewood public and private interests, including the Lakewood Observer, Lakewood Alive, Lakewood Community Progress Inc., Lakewood Chamber of Commerce, Rockport, Rosewood, City, Schools, Library, pony up and contract on a hourly/monthly basis with a marketing professional. Say eight hours per month at $40 or $50 per hour. Let's see what an outstanding marketing professional can deliver.
This seems a more reasonable, flexible and less expensive approach than expecting City Hall to hire one in this difficult period.
Kenneth Warren
I agree wholeheartedly. Although I don't know that the schools are in any position to pony up any more than the city.
In any case, before you can engage in "marketing", you need to know the "market." We all think we know Lakewood's strengths, some profess to know its weaknesses. But do we really know its ATTITUDES? It's human nature to filter out those who disagree with our own notions.
One person on a board can say she wants a newer house and two peopel can respond that she's wrong for wanting it. But when a scientific survey shows that 73% of residents want more modern housing options, the city certainly has to take that into consideration when forming public policy. At least, if they're smart.
Having results in black and white, gathered scientifically by professionals, gives us the benchmarks we need and challenges our dearly-held notions, the warm and fuzzy ones in some cases, the dark and dour ones in others.
And its remarkable what how knowing public attitude can affect public policy. The schools are a good example. The model for schools everywhere is big schools and buses. We could have had one middle school and three elementary schools that kids rode buses to, but a goodly sized sample of Lakewood flatly rejected that notion.
So, who drives this?