In order to keep at least a *little* consistency on the threads - I thought I'd start this one as I feel that determining the brand is a very worthwhile discussion.
For starters, I will say that in my humble existence, a brand has been something that identifies a product. It gives me, in the most succinct form possible, the ability to know exactly what I can expect and what I will get when I purchase or receive something associated with that brand. It can be a name, a symbol, a slogan, a bit of music, or most often a combination of things. A name that is associated with a particular set of colors and a certain piece of music, for example.
At first blush that would seem to indicate that trying to brand a city is like trying to herd cats! But as I think about this more, I realize that I *do* think that branding a city can be a valid tool for generating much needed enthusiasm in the community and for creating interest from investors. After all, most brands we know and love have grown and changed over the years to reflect the current state of the product/company. What is perceived as the Lakewood brand today is not necessarily what it will be two years from now. No, branding is not the solution - but I think it is a tool that we can use to execute solutions to some of our common problems.
Certainly, the Lakewood brand is one that is diverse. We cannot say that Lakewood is a city of artsy folks any more that we can say that it is a factory city or a city of lawyers... it is all of these things and then some. What else do you think of when you think of Lakewood? Me? I think of home.
So..... Is branding a city possible? Necessary? Worthwhile?
I think so.
Peace,
~Charyn