Why Not Prosecute, Why Not Look Deeper?
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:25 am
After watching Regan, on HBO last night, it is clear he lied many times to the American
people. If we are to use the same standard for President Regan, as Bill Clinton, why
cannot we not go back, and clear up the record that he should have been impeached not
for one thing but many, many things.
Just because he misdirected us, why do we have to not rewrite history the way it was?
This has always bothered me about past presidents. Let's correct the records. Let's get
history straight, especially when we have the documents to prove the crimes. Why let
any of them rise through the history books as GREAT?
Today I was watching the first of many leaks from the Rumsfield notes. Again, it is just
pitiful, that America continues to turn a blind eye to the level of abuse that various
administrations have gone through. Why did Rumsfield demand going into Iraq less than
one hour after 9/11? Why do we let revisionists continue to say, "He was linked to
terrorism against the USA"? Why do we have to throw facts and history out of the books,
and instead create fables and outright lies?
Plain and simple, Rumsfield and President Bush's push to chase ghosts, has caused the
longest and most expensive war in US History. None of which ever had to happen.
I do not understand this country.
FWIW.
people. If we are to use the same standard for President Regan, as Bill Clinton, why
cannot we not go back, and clear up the record that he should have been impeached not
for one thing but many, many things.
Just because he misdirected us, why do we have to not rewrite history the way it was?
This has always bothered me about past presidents. Let's correct the records. Let's get
history straight, especially when we have the documents to prove the crimes. Why let
any of them rise through the history books as GREAT?
Today I was watching the first of many leaks from the Rumsfield notes. Again, it is just
pitiful, that America continues to turn a blind eye to the level of abuse that various
administrations have gone through. Why did Rumsfield demand going into Iraq less than
one hour after 9/11? Why do we let revisionists continue to say, "He was linked to
terrorism against the USA"? Why do we have to throw facts and history out of the books,
and instead create fables and outright lies?
Plain and simple, Rumsfield and President Bush's push to chase ghosts, has caused the
longest and most expensive war in US History. None of which ever had to happen.
I do not understand this country.
FWIW.