Page 1 of 3

The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 7:14 am
by Bill Call
ORANGE COUNTY (CALIFORNIA) NEWSPAPER-New Immigrants
This is a very good letter to the editor. This woman made some good
points..
For some reason, people have difficulty structuring their arguments when arguing against supporting the currently proposed immigration revisions. This lady made the argument pretty simple. NOT printed in the Orange County Paper...................


Newspapers simply won't publish letters to the editor which they either
deem politically incorrect (read below) or which does not agree with the philosophy they're pushing on the public. This woman wrote a great letter to the editor that should have been published; but, with your help it will get published via cyberspace!




From:
"David LaBonte"
My wife, Rosemary, wrote a wonderful letter to the editor of the OC Register which, of course, was not printed. So, I decided to "print" it myself by sending it out on the Internet. Pass it along if you feel so inclined. Written in response to a series of letters to the editor in the Orange County Register:



Dear Editor:
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.


Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people
like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept
this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when
there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the
United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a
long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get
down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made
a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in
good and bad times. They made learning English a primary
rule in their new American households and some even changed
their names to blend in with their new home.



They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their
children a new life and did everything in their power to
help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was
handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws
to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.


Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out.
My father fought along side men whose parents had come
straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None
of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought
about what country their parents had come from. They were
Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of
Japan . They were defending the United States of America as
one people.


When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking
for the French-American or the German American or the Irish
American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we
carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of
those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up
another country's flag and waving it to represent who they
were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had
sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew
what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting
pot into one red, white and blue bowl.



And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same
rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by
playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the
entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their
mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American
is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on
Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that
for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future
generations to create a land that has become a beacon for
those legally searching for a better life. I think they
would be appalled that they are being used as an example by
those waving foreign country flags.


And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on
the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about
dismantling the United States just yet.



(signed)
Rosemary LaBonte

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 10:27 am
by sharon kinsella
And in the beginning, there was no Ellis Island. The immigrants from Europe, just took what they wanted and ran off and killed the original citizens. Many of them were here to escape religious persecution. Many were here because their own countries didn't want them, they emptied out their jails and put these people on a fast boat to this land.

This country was discovered, the acknowledged date, was 1492 I believe. That's when illegals started to come here.

1900 was when we established "our" idea of legal immigration. Up until that time, all the invaders came and made their homes here.

Convenient memories.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 11:30 am
by Jim DeVito
So Bill, You arguing why BIGnews newspapers are worthless?

And on subject. Can we just give Arizona back to mexico and call it a day?

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:28 pm
by Bill Call
Jim DeVito wrote:So Bill, You arguing why BIGnews newspapers are worthless?

And on subject. Can we just give Arizona back to mexico and call it a day?


What right does Mexico have too Arizona? It was never part of the Aztec Empire. It became part of New Spain when the Spanish conquered it. Mexico inherited the conquered territory and we took it from Mexico fair and square.

Why are there Turks in Turkey?
Why are there Arabs in Palistine?

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:49 pm
by sharon kinsella
"Why do the stars go on shining? Why does the moon shine above? . . ."

or

"Tell me why the Ivy twines, tell me why the stars do shine, tell me why the skies so blue, then I will tell you you ain't got a clue."

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:52 pm
by Roy Pitchford
This country was discovered, the acknowledged date, was 1492 I believe. That's when illegals started to come here.

First, Columbus never set foot in this "country". During his 4 voyages, he charted and explored many islands of the Caribbean and some of Central America. From what I can remember from school, Juan Ponce de Leon was the first when he landed in Florida.

Second, The Vikings landed in what is now Newfoundland in roughly 1000 AD. Look up 'Vinland' and see what you find.

Third, so were the early homo sapiens illegals when the migrated out of Africa into Europe, Asia and across the Bering land bridge to North America and South America?

Bill Call wrote:What right does Mexico have too Arizona? It was never part of the Aztec Empire. It became part of New Spain when the Spanish conquered it. Mexico inherited the conquered territory and we took it from Mexico fair and square.

Why are there Turks in Turkey?
Why are there Arabs in Palestine?


It was more than fair-and-square.
After having won the Mexican-American War, not only did we give Mexico back some of the territory that had been captured by American forces, but we paid them over $18 million for the Mexican Cession (present day California, Nevada, Utah and parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Wyoming and a small corner of Colorado). The rest of Arizona came when we paid them $10 million for the Gadsden Purchase (it was necessary for a southern transcontinental railroad).

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 7:07 am
by Bret Callentine
Roy Pitchford wrote:
...we paid them over $18 million for the Mexican Cession (present day California, Nevada, Utah and parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Wyoming and a small corner of Colorado)...


do we still have the receipt? Maybe California is still under warranty and we can get a refund.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 8:18 am
by Roy Pitchford
Bret Callentine wrote:
Roy Pitchford wrote:
...we paid them over $18 million for the Mexican Cession (present day California, Nevada, Utah and parts of Arizona, New Mexico, Wyoming and a small corner of Colorado)...


do we still have the receipt? Maybe California is still under warranty and we can get a refund.

I don't know...I'm sure the original Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo is somewhere.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 1:43 pm
by sharon kinsella
Never said a darn thing about Columbus Roy. I said "1492" because that is what everyone sites as the date America was discovered. Whatever. Ponce should have taken a hike too.

You want to quote something important, quote when the Native American Bur. of Immigration opened and said "Hey yeah, come on in and kill us and steal from us".

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 10:58 pm
by Roy Pitchford
sharon kinsella wrote:This country was discovered, the acknowledged date, was 1492 I believe. That's when illegals started to come here.

1900 was when we established "our" idea of legal immigration. Up until that time, all the invaders came and made their homes here.

sharon kinsella wrote:You want to quote something important, quote when the Native American Bur. of Immigration opened and said "Hey yeah, come on in and kill us and steal from us".

Wow Sharon, that sounds downright conservative of you.
I mean, its the conservatives that are the hate-mongering bigots, right? That's what I've heard in the media anyways. Those conservative teabagging racists...

I thought you said you were a liberal...aka tolerant, diverse and compassionate.

I hear no tolerance from your words, Sharon. I hear an attack against anyone that came from Europe to the United States...in other words, against white people.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 9:44 am
by sharon kinsella
No you're hearing is off.

Hear it is, clear as a bell, WE'RE ALL ILLEGALS. There was no legal process set up for us to enter this country.

Don't twist my words. I'm as literal as they come.

Also I never said I was a liberal. I'm a radical leftie. I believe in things that benefit all people, even you Roy whether you think it's good or not. I do not believe in things.

Look on youtube for George Carlin's bit about "Stuff". His sarcastic take on Stuff, sums up capitalism and why I don't believe in it.

History does indeed repeat itself.

Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:24 pm
by Greg Morley

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:02 pm
by ryan costa
back in 1800, when all this stuff the Founding Fathers(!!!) had unanimously written about and planned out was happening....pretty much anyone who showed up could be a legal resident. So long as they didn't get too notorious in a sinister way.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 8:13 am
by Roy Pitchford
sharon kinsella wrote:Also I never said I was a liberal. I'm a radical leftie. I believe in things that benefit all people, even you Roy whether you think it's good or not.

Could you clarify a point for me? How do you define "benefit for all people"?

I ask because there is a definite distinction. What is good for a society is frequently not what's good for the individual. Don't take it from me...


Maybe its of benefit to society to kill anyone incapable of pulling their own weight, but its certainly of no benefit to those individuals that are deemed unfit.

Re: The Letter To The Editor They Dare Not Print

Posted: Fri May 28, 2010 11:39 am
by sharon kinsella
By who? Who would judge, who would be chosen. Maybe we could just be like the Spartans and throw the disabled, the sick and maybe even the old.

How about the arrogant, narcissistic youth. Maybe those that would choose power over as opposed to power from within.

We could rid ourselves of hypocrites, those who believe in and worship and invisible entity.

I know we can get rid of those who consume too many material goods.

Babies, yeah, let's get rid of them. What are they good for, they eat, they poop and they do nothing useful.

You are a very foolish young man.