Vince Frantz wrote:We'd have more hope if people did more than simply shoot photos of tags and make posts on message boards. That's right - if you read this thread and you aren't ready to start untagging then you have willingly and knowingly rejected the Un-Tagger Meme and therefore joined the ranks of those who aren't willing to do anything about this.
Vince
You raise many valid points especially taking matters into your own hands.
My questions would be...
You have a vested interest in the skatepark. You and Stosh finally got things moving, and
got it built. You are a boarder, and teach and have businesses that revolve around skate
boarding. So you can easily see the skatepark as "your baby." So cleaning it makes sense
and gives a sense of satisfaction.
But how many other things have you removed tagging from?
The use of acetone on most painted surfaces, cause a nasty reaction, that many taggers
that I have spoken with feel just as empowered, as with the original tagging. I remember
being in Sonoma over a decade ago. Someone had painted a huge swastika maybe 100'
in diameter on the large rock in the middle of town. They had cleaned it so instead of
a black swastika it was a lighter pink swastika on red rocks.
Over by me the city merely painted them gray, on a brown/beige wall, and now their paint
is falling off and the graffiti is back. We both know this gives them too much pleasure.
So should the city, along with all of us be doing a better job? Should the city spend more
money on getting rid and catching the taggers, or flowerbaskets? Should the city spend
nearly $10,000 on cornhole promotions, or graffiti? Should the city buy massive amounts
of elephant snot, and make it available to residents to remove graffiti? Is the state of the
city such, that we all need to carry a variety of solvents around?
One thing I have always wondered is what are the benefits of bringing outsiders in
and promoting a city, or area that is filthy and unkept? Does it not make people go
back home, and say "Was in Lakewood today, whew!" The analogy is frosting and
uncooked cake.
I understand the idea. See litter pick it up. Graffiti by its nature is very different and much
harder to pick up.
Jerry
I have interviewed the graffiti "artist" that was responsible for the Bullock piece. Decided
to never let it see the light of day, but working it into the book. He has 10 copies of the
Scene article, one framed on the wall. All his friends know about it. The artist is not a
teen but a 22 year-old that was frustrated that his councilman was doing nothing. Other
taggers have read it. I have a girl that works part time at AGS Printwear, she is probably
a graffiti artist. Very talented, that we got from an work program. She has sketch book
after sketch book, of good art that all has that "graffiti" feel to it. She loved the piece. I
told her, "I see once piece of her art on a wall in Lakewood, job over."
If taggers read one publication in this county, it is probably the Scene, as it is geared to
those out at night, having fun, and young. The piece was insightful as Michael is a very
good writer and Observer. But from the council person's side, ego driven, desperate to
get press and buy cool. It was stupid.
Brad
GLOW comment
.