If Sleeping With The President Qualifies You To....
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:33 am
be president then the Democratic primary should be a lot more crowded.
The Observation Deck
Neighbors Celebrating Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity While Speaking Over The Digital Fence
https://deck.lakewoodobserver.com/
If Sleeping With The President Qualifies You To....
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:41 am
Don't feed the trolls.
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:49 am
Some people have been elected on lesser qualifications...
?
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:18 pm
Valerie Molinski wrote:Some people have been elected on lesser qualifications...
Just for fun:
Who? and what qualifications?
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 2:23 pm
correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe George Washington had any previous presidential, vice presidential or even senate experience.
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:21 pm
But he had all those nifty portraits for his campaign literature!Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:56 am
Eisenhower had no previous political experience before being "drafted" into the Presidency.
Lincoln...former State Representative who became a one-term US Representative.
And so on. Presidents have won with less experience than the current crop of candidates. Some with quite a bit less.
Lincoln...former State Representative who became a one-term US Representative.
And so on. Presidents have won with less experience than the current crop of candidates. Some with quite a bit less.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:12 am
Anyone that doesn't believe that Hillary was a close advisor to her husband during the 8 years that he was president is fooling themself.
She wasn't a one night stand. She was his partner - I think perhaps more intellectually and politically than romantically.
I didn't vote for her in the primary - but I don't question her abilities. I think she is incredibly smart. She works amazingly hard. She is organized. She is not charismatic. She tends to micromanage. She is not an idea person - but an implementer.
We could all argue if Govenors have the foreign relation experience which Senators, congressmen and Generals have. We can argue that those individuals don't have the economic experience that Gov. have. We can argue that the more experience you have in Washington the farther you are removed from the common citizen. All are valid points. There isn't one perfect person. There are points that I like and dislike about all 3 candidates left - but any one of them is qualified to be president.
She wasn't a one night stand. She was his partner - I think perhaps more intellectually and politically than romantically.
I didn't vote for her in the primary - but I don't question her abilities. I think she is incredibly smart. She works amazingly hard. She is organized. She is not charismatic. She tends to micromanage. She is not an idea person - but an implementer.
We could all argue if Govenors have the foreign relation experience which Senators, congressmen and Generals have. We can argue that those individuals don't have the economic experience that Gov. have. We can argue that the more experience you have in Washington the farther you are removed from the common citizen. All are valid points. There isn't one perfect person. There are points that I like and dislike about all 3 candidates left - but any one of them is qualified to be president.
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:33 pm
It's a funny joke to denigrate and dismiss Ms. Clinton.
Mr. Call is full of fun. Or at least that's how I'm spelling the word today.
Mr. Call is full of fun. Or at least that's how I'm spelling the word today.
?
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
dl meckes wrote:It's a funny joke to denigrate and dismiss Ms. Clinton.
Mr. Call is full of fun. Or at least that's how I'm spelling the word today.
Who said anything about Mrs. Clinton?