Page 1 of 4
Where On Earth Is Dennis Kucinich?
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:22 pm
by Bill Call
I thought it might be fun to track the various travels of our absentee congressman.
http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2007/ ... iture.html
Re: Where On Earth Is Dennis Kucinich?
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:49 pm
by Richard Cole
Now that you've tracked it, are you still having fun
Re: Where On Earth Is Dennis Kucinich?
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:37 am
by Bill Call
Richard Cole wrote:Now that you've tracked it, are you still having fun
This will be an ongoing project. And since I have a peculiar sense of fun, yes.
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:52 am
by Jeff Endress
Bill
You need to devise an illustration....like a suitcase with bunches of tourist stamps!
Jeff
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:02 am
by David Lay
Jeff Endress wrote:Bill
You need to devise an illustration....like a suitcase with bunches of tourist stamps!
Jeff
Paging Gary Dumm to the thread....
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:50 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Dennis went to Syria to meet with President Asad. Instead of going to Syria, he should be working on solving the problems that face his district. He is a congressman.. just sayin.. I am not sure what he was thinking by meeting with Asad. He has no authority to accomplish anything.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:16 pm
by Brian Pedaci
For once, Stephen, we agree. My exact thought on seeing that headline was 'who the h*** does he think he is"? Pelosi's trip was OK with me - she's actually in a position of leadership, but Dennis apparently is making this visit in his capacity as President of HappyFluffyBunnyLand.
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:04 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Brian Pedaci wrote:For once, Stephen, we agree. My exact thought on seeing that headline was 'who the h*** does he think he is"? Pelosi's trip was OK with me - she's actually in a position of leadership, but Dennis apparently is making this visit in his capacity as President of HappyFluffyBunnyLand.
It is a cold night in hell tonight
I also agree with you on Pelosi.
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:06 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:13 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Is it just me or is Dennis void of some facts about the war in Iraq?
R
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:44 am
by Bill Call
Stephen Eisel wrote:http://www.breitbart.tv/html/5418.html
Dennis on Syrian TV
I guess you and I are something of an anomaly here in Lakewood.
The leadership in Syria has massacred hundreds of thousands of its own citizens, assassinated the top leadership in Lebanon, financed terror attacks against American soldiers, supported continued attacks against Israel and offered support to the terrorists in Iraq.
The response of Dennis Kucinich? To give aid and comfort to the enemy.
It was once said that "Treason doth never prosper. For if it prosper none dare call it treason". We live in prosperous times.
That is why you and I are an anomaly. Dennis Kucinich cheers on one the most reprehensible killers of American soldiers and his district cheers him on. We happen to think there is something wrong with that. The majority of the people in his district do not.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:18 am
by Stephen Eisel
and not to mention that some of the WMD's from Iraq probably ended up in Syria right at the beginning of the war. I bet that subject did not come up when Dennis talked to President Asad.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:55 am
by Frank Murtaugh
Kucinich's trip to Syria, his meeting with Assad, and his appearance on Syrian TV are, at best, an exhibition of extremely poor judgment.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:44 am
by Bret Callentine
I'm curious, what was the purpose of this trip? Exactly what does he hope to accomplish?
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:59 pm
by Scott MacGregor
Dennis is running for President --so going to Syria is just a way he can be seen on the international stage. He's an American, he has the freedom to do that.
He deserves all of the praise and criticism he gets.
What bothers me is the opinion that we shouldn't be talking to the Syrians or the Iranians.
Sure they're scoundrels! So were the Nazis but we talked to them.
So are the North Koreans but we talked and talked and talked to them.
So were the North Vietnamese but we talked to them.
The only differences between Iraq and those other wars are in the body counts.
Do we always have to lose Biblical numbers of our best and brightest before we decide to sit down and talk about it with our enemies?
C'mon for pete's sake--without the establishment of a dialogue with the inhabitants of the Middle Eastern world --this conflict will go on and the body count will continue to rise and this war will become a struggle passed from generation to generation.
Talk to the scoundrels! I don't like the bastards either but my children's future is at stake here.