Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:07 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
From the Board of Election
.
Re: Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:36 pm
by Bridget Conant
Bullock had a very poor showing. He might as well have lost.
The machine won’t back any further attempts at higher office when he can’t even get the votes from his current constituents.
O’Leary, Litten, Anderson- take note. You’re all up soon.
Re: Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:31 pm
by Stan Austin
Tom-- that's an adios. Stan
Re: Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:52 pm
by Michael Deneen
Stan Austin wrote:Tom-- that's an adios. Stan
I still think that's wishful thinking.
There's nothing more dangerous than a wounded animal....and that's exactly what Bullock is at this point.
There is a history of crooked politicians outliving their political obituaries.
Re: Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:09 pm
by Bridget Conant
Will he rise again - like the “Ed Fitzgerald?”
Re: Recount Over No Change Bullock Squeaks By With 16 Votes
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:35 pm
by cameron karslake
Bridget Conant wrote:Will he rise again - like the “Ed Fitzgerald?”
