Page 1 of 1

APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:40 pm
by Bridget Conant
Sharon Harvey, CEO of the Cleveland Animal Protective League, has provided a statement on their Twitter and Facebook page denouncing the city of Lakewood and its decision to force Charlie's owner to remove him from the city.

In the statement she states that the APL and Jennifer Scott fully followed procedures to insure Charlie was approved to be honed in Lakewood. She further states that visibly classifying a dog as a put bull is inaccurate in most every case.

She implores Lakewood to move away from Breed Specific Legislation.

How's that for a smackdown?

When will Lakewood do the right thing?

Here is the text of the Facebook post if you don't use Facebook.
We're with Charlie!

Earlier this week, the city of Lakewood, which specifically bans "pit bulls dogs and canary dogs," gave Charlie's owner 30 days to get him out of the city.

Charlie was adopted from the Cleveland APL as a puppy. His owner and our adoption team followed Lakewood's approval process to a 'T' and permission was granted for Charlie to move in. But, when the sweet, goofy boy escaped through an open gate and ended up at the Lakewood Animal Shelter, everything changed, and not because he had done anything wrong other than go for an unauthorized romp. More details are in the story below.

The Cleveland APL is vehemently against breed bans and breed discrimination. Not only are these bans a flawed and ineffective strategy for protecting the public from truly dangerous dogs, but they are virtually impossible to enforce with any modicum of objectivity and fairness to the animals and families involved.

Trying to identify the breed of a dog by visual identification is an exercise in futility. Studies have shown that experienced animal professionals, such as veterinarians, dog wardens, animal welfare workers, and dog trainers are about 25% accurate when we try to visually identify the breed of a dog. We'd do better to flip a coin! Yet, animals and families are being destroyed by breed-specific legislation simply because of how a dog looks, not how it behaves.

We implore Lakewood to overturn this flawed ordinance in favor of enacting an effective and enforceable dangerous dog law that will better protect public safety and hold irresponsible owners accountable. While we're at it, Parma, Garfield Heights, Warrensville Heights, and Akron, too!

And, as I said earlier ... #ImWithCharlie ... we're with Charlie ... 100% ...

Sharon Harvey
CEO, Cleveland Animal Protective League

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 9:53 pm
by Bridget Conant
Great article.

http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/in_defe ... l_partner/
Since the 1980s, the media have falsely portrayed the pit bull as a bloodthirsty monster, inherently more dangerous than other strong breeds of dog. There is absolutely no factual basis for that narrative,

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 5:29 am
by Nadhal Eadeh
If I recall correctly, Dobermans, Rottweilers, German Shepherds and now pit bulls have been propped up as dogs to “fear”. Each decade brought a vigilance towards each breed.

This law is silly. It was intended to discriminate against certain types of people. If council were smart, they would put in place an incredibly aggressive law that targets owners, not the breed.

Nadhal

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:19 am
by cameron karslake
Too bad our council isn't "smart" enough to right this wrong, Nadhal.

When sensible people point out council's misguided ways, they dig in, plug their ears and ignore them.

Yeah, that's the kind of responsive government we want here!

Business as usual in Lakewood, OH!

I'm with Charlie.

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:39 am
by Bridget Conant
Rumor has it that Summers is adamant that the breed ban will remain. (So many leakers in his administration, it's like the Trump White House!)

They apparently think the Lakewood law is somehow different than the Reynoldsburg law that the Ohio Appeals Court struck down. Of course, the courts will decide that.

Just more money we taxpayers will foot as well as the growing bad publicity for the city.

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:16 am
by dl meckes
Summers also said he was running for Mayor to see the hospital deal done. He has never wanted to save or improve the former hospital and now he wants to draw a line in the sand over a puppy.

Re: APL Denounces City of Lakewood

Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:23 am
by Bridget Conant
dl meckes wrote:Summers also said he was running for Mayor to see the hospital deal done. He has never wanted to save or improve the former hospital and now he wants to draw a line in the sand over a puppy.
Just who does Mayor Mike Summers serve?