Carnegie Exec Sentenced to Prison---Crooked Bullock & Fitz?
Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2017 7:34 am
http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/ ... nstruction.
So a guy falsified documents and diverted $300K on a construction project--he was investigated by the FBI and went to jail.
What if a top Carnegie Exec was also a target in that probe?
What if public records show incumbent Tom Bullock wrote Summers, Madigan and Butler suggesting a criminal act in furtherance of a scheme to defraud Lakewood taxpayers of $100M?
What if Bullock suggested changing votes and proposed falsification of records in anticipation of an Ohio Ethics Commission investigation so he and Madigan could vote for the $100M giveaway that benefitted his friend and mentor Ed Fitzgerald?
What if Bullock actually falsified a public record to help Summers get re-elected to aid the $100M giveaway and Butler was aware of this falsification?
What if the public records were intentionally withheld until after the public voting on the $100M giveaway?
Would this make any difference in Council's voting for or against the Fitz-Carnegie "deal" with "expanded footprint"?
Would this make any difference in the public voting for or against Crooked Incumbent Bullock?
So a guy falsified documents and diverted $300K on a construction project--he was investigated by the FBI and went to jail.
What if a top Carnegie Exec was also a target in that probe?
What if public records show incumbent Tom Bullock wrote Summers, Madigan and Butler suggesting a criminal act in furtherance of a scheme to defraud Lakewood taxpayers of $100M?
What if Bullock suggested changing votes and proposed falsification of records in anticipation of an Ohio Ethics Commission investigation so he and Madigan could vote for the $100M giveaway that benefitted his friend and mentor Ed Fitzgerald?
What if Bullock actually falsified a public record to help Summers get re-elected to aid the $100M giveaway and Butler was aware of this falsification?
What if the public records were intentionally withheld until after the public voting on the $100M giveaway?
Would this make any difference in Council's voting for or against the Fitz-Carnegie "deal" with "expanded footprint"?
Would this make any difference in the public voting for or against Crooked Incumbent Bullock?