Defining "Public Money" Given Away to "Friends": So What?
Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:58 am
R.C. 149,011 (C) defines "Public money" to include "all money received or collected by or due a public official, whether in accordance with or under authority of any law, ordinance, resolution, or order, under color of office, or otherwise. It also includes any money collected by any individual on behalf of a public office or as a purported representative or agent of the public office.
(E) "Color of office" includes any act purported or alleged to be done under any law, ordinance, resolution, order, or other pretension to official right, power, or authority."
So, Summers, Bullock, and Madigan headed the board of a "City Owned Hospital" that the Clinic expert said was worth more than $150M.
So, the CAFR says the City "sold" the "City Owned Hospital" to for $9.6M.
So, City Hall, including Summers, Bullock, Pae and Butler all said we didn't own the hospital and the "money" was not "public money."
So, Pae signed and affidavit notarized and filed in Court by Butler claiming that the alleged $32M in "money" that the Master Agreement says is to go to the "New Foundation" will be "received by the City."
So, City Council and Summers appointed a Foundation Task Force to decide what to do with the "money."
So, Summers told the New Foundation Task Force he does not want the City to control the "money".
So, Butler gave the New Foundation Task Force instructions that they are covered by the Open Meetings Act while they decide what to do with the "money."
So, Sam O'Leary said that City Council does not have to agree to what the task force decides to do with the "money."
So, Butler, City Hall, and their insurers are spending tens of thousands (and possibly hundreds of thousands) of "money" to fight, deny and hide what has happened and what continues to happen now and into the future regarding "money" given away and to be given away.
So, does any of this involve "public money"?
So, City Council members are saying "So What" let's move on?
So, should we just move on and "come together" as a community?
So What?
(E) "Color of office" includes any act purported or alleged to be done under any law, ordinance, resolution, order, or other pretension to official right, power, or authority."
So, Summers, Bullock, and Madigan headed the board of a "City Owned Hospital" that the Clinic expert said was worth more than $150M.
So, the CAFR says the City "sold" the "City Owned Hospital" to for $9.6M.
So, City Hall, including Summers, Bullock, Pae and Butler all said we didn't own the hospital and the "money" was not "public money."
So, Pae signed and affidavit notarized and filed in Court by Butler claiming that the alleged $32M in "money" that the Master Agreement says is to go to the "New Foundation" will be "received by the City."
So, City Council and Summers appointed a Foundation Task Force to decide what to do with the "money."
So, Summers told the New Foundation Task Force he does not want the City to control the "money".
So, Butler gave the New Foundation Task Force instructions that they are covered by the Open Meetings Act while they decide what to do with the "money."
So, Sam O'Leary said that City Council does not have to agree to what the task force decides to do with the "money."
So, Butler, City Hall, and their insurers are spending tens of thousands (and possibly hundreds of thousands) of "money" to fight, deny and hide what has happened and what continues to happen now and into the future regarding "money" given away and to be given away.
So, does any of this involve "public money"?
So, City Council members are saying "So What" let's move on?
So, should we just move on and "come together" as a community?
So What?