"Quiet" Ryan Nowlin Should Reconsider Re-Election Bid
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:52 am
Ryan Nowlin is a gentleman--a quiet gentleman.
Among elected officials, he seems to have the least to say in public and rarely makes public comments.
Mr. Nowlin is also a lawyer--he and his law firm were the subject of ethics opinions pertaining to the closure of the hospital.
The Ohio ethics Commission wrote concerning Mr. Ryan:
"The council member, whose law partner serves on the board of LHA, cannot participate in decisions regarding the closing of Lakewood Hospital because his law partner has a fiduciary interest in the public contract that would result in the city acquiring healthcare services for the benefit of its residents."
His law partner, Joe Gibbons, resigned from LHA amid the ethics issues. It took me over a year of requesting the public record of Mr. Gibbons' resignation for the city to produce it. Mr. Nowlin was part of numerous emails concerning my requests, but remained silent.
It has been reported that an associate in Mr. Nowlin's law firm also resigned from the LHF board amid the ethics issues related to the hospital closure.
Mr. Nowlin remained silent concerning these ethical issues.
It is now also clear that Mr. Nowlin was among those council member who participated in violations of Open Meeting Laws.
This week, Ryan Nowlin's attorney, Kevin Butler conceded in a Court filing: "A cure recognizes that there was a violation" [of theOpen Meeting Laws]...
Mr. Nowlin, a lawyer, who knew or should have known the law, has remained silent concerning these violations offering no explanation of apology.
Among Mr. Nowlin's few public comments on the hospital matter was his claim that the Master Agreement and Ordinance 49-15 were "the only way to ensure the uninterrupted delivery of emergency services in our city." https://youtu.be/lChNMhrAXCk?t=5m37s Since the city never put the delivery of emergency service out to bid with any other provider, Mr. Nowlin's primary publicly stated reason for his decision on his hospital vote was simply not accurate. That statement was made prior to an public deliberations.
Given the controversy in Lakewood about the lack of government transparency and now the belated admission a violation of Open Meetings Laws, Lakewood needs to heal and needs new, more open and transparent leaders.
Mr. O'Leary has said of Mr. Nowlin: "I don't know why he is even on Council..." adding that a seat of city Council seems to belong to Mr. Nowlin's law firm (an apparent reference to Mr. Gibbons' prior tenure as a member of Council.)
Mr. Nowlin should reconsider what is best for Lakewood and withdraw his re-election bid. Mr. Nowlin should set aside and allow Lakewood to heal.
Among elected officials, he seems to have the least to say in public and rarely makes public comments.
Mr. Nowlin is also a lawyer--he and his law firm were the subject of ethics opinions pertaining to the closure of the hospital.
The Ohio ethics Commission wrote concerning Mr. Ryan:
"The council member, whose law partner serves on the board of LHA, cannot participate in decisions regarding the closing of Lakewood Hospital because his law partner has a fiduciary interest in the public contract that would result in the city acquiring healthcare services for the benefit of its residents."
His law partner, Joe Gibbons, resigned from LHA amid the ethics issues. It took me over a year of requesting the public record of Mr. Gibbons' resignation for the city to produce it. Mr. Nowlin was part of numerous emails concerning my requests, but remained silent.
It has been reported that an associate in Mr. Nowlin's law firm also resigned from the LHF board amid the ethics issues related to the hospital closure.
Mr. Nowlin remained silent concerning these ethical issues.
It is now also clear that Mr. Nowlin was among those council member who participated in violations of Open Meeting Laws.
This week, Ryan Nowlin's attorney, Kevin Butler conceded in a Court filing: "A cure recognizes that there was a violation" [of theOpen Meeting Laws]...
Mr. Nowlin, a lawyer, who knew or should have known the law, has remained silent concerning these violations offering no explanation of apology.
Among Mr. Nowlin's few public comments on the hospital matter was his claim that the Master Agreement and Ordinance 49-15 were "the only way to ensure the uninterrupted delivery of emergency services in our city." https://youtu.be/lChNMhrAXCk?t=5m37s Since the city never put the delivery of emergency service out to bid with any other provider, Mr. Nowlin's primary publicly stated reason for his decision on his hospital vote was simply not accurate. That statement was made prior to an public deliberations.
Given the controversy in Lakewood about the lack of government transparency and now the belated admission a violation of Open Meetings Laws, Lakewood needs to heal and needs new, more open and transparent leaders.
Mr. O'Leary has said of Mr. Nowlin: "I don't know why he is even on Council..." adding that a seat of city Council seems to belong to Mr. Nowlin's law firm (an apparent reference to Mr. Gibbons' prior tenure as a member of Council.)
Mr. Nowlin should reconsider what is best for Lakewood and withdraw his re-election bid. Mr. Nowlin should set aside and allow Lakewood to heal.