"Grave Concerns" Over "The Most Openly Deliberated Ordinance in the City’s History" Huh?
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 am
So City Council and Kevin Butler claim in the attached "Motion to Excuse" that "Ordinance 49-15 is likely the most openly deliberated ordinance in the City’s history." But Defendant Sam O'Leary testified that there were no deliberations on Ordinance 49-15 until December 7, 2015. And it was passed on December 21, 2015 after just three short Council meetings where Defendants O'Leary, Marx and Nowlin declared, without any evidence or discussion whatsoever, that the major rationale for passage of the Ordinance was it was "the only way to ensure uninterrupted emergency room services.."
The public record is clear that there was no evidence ever presented before, during or after December, 2015, that this was "the only way"--According to one Council member it was simply the "easier button" as apposed to true due diligence on other options.
After secretly deliberating over (or not deliberating at all over) their "Motion to Excuse" their attendance at a mediation, 5 Council members and 2 former Council members declared in that motion:
"City Council rightly has grave concerns about its members coming together behind closed doors with the Court’s mediator and Appellant to discuss whether there can be any resolution to this appeal in light of the very public process by which Ordinance 49-15 was enacted."
Grave concerns about meeting with a sitting Senator and a Court appointed mediator pursuant to a Court order?
If Ordinance 49-15 was "The Most Openly Deliberated Ordinance in the City’s History" giving away over $100M after grand standing lip service declarations without any evidence, then we should all be concerned about how little deliberation is occurring over such other important Council matters, e.g. the 2017 Budget "Hearings."
The public record is clear that there was no evidence ever presented before, during or after December, 2015, that this was "the only way"--According to one Council member it was simply the "easier button" as apposed to true due diligence on other options.
After secretly deliberating over (or not deliberating at all over) their "Motion to Excuse" their attendance at a mediation, 5 Council members and 2 former Council members declared in that motion:
"City Council rightly has grave concerns about its members coming together behind closed doors with the Court’s mediator and Appellant to discuss whether there can be any resolution to this appeal in light of the very public process by which Ordinance 49-15 was enacted."
Grave concerns about meeting with a sitting Senator and a Court appointed mediator pursuant to a Court order?
If Ordinance 49-15 was "The Most Openly Deliberated Ordinance in the City’s History" giving away over $100M after grand standing lip service declarations without any evidence, then we should all be concerned about how little deliberation is occurring over such other important Council matters, e.g. the 2017 Budget "Hearings."