Page 1 of 1
Is the Observer becoming what it loathes?
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 8:38 am
by Corey Rossen
The Observer states they are fighting against what they claim to be a government monopoly in media. They fear that the government is controlling the message when in fact the Observer is running off their own oppositions in order to become their own monopoly of their message.
Ahhh, the hypocracy of it all.
Re: Is the Observer becoming what it loathes?
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:26 am
by Bill Call
Corey Rossen wrote:The Observer states they are fighting against what they claim to be a government monopoly in media. They fear that the government is controlling the message when in fact the Observer is running off their own oppositions in order to become their own monopoly of their message.
Ahhh, the hypocracy of it all.
You are never serious but I still have to ask: Are you serious?
Any one is free to post or respond to a post. Anyone is free to offer information and opinion. Build Lakewood and Mayor Summers are free to defend their actions and opinions.
They refuse to do either. What they do choose to do is use police power to threaten people into silence.
The new mantra is: The Lakewood Observer must be destroyed!
Re: Is the Observer becoming what it loathes?
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:56 am
by Corey Rossen
Bill Call wrote:What they do choose to do is use police power to threaten people into silence.
Sounds like limitations and banishments, both under discussions here at the Observer as stated by its leader, Mayor Jim O'Bryan.
Don't overlook due to your own bias.
Re: Is the Observer becoming what it loathes?
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 11:38 am
by cameron karslake
Really? You really think the Observer/Jim O'Bryan is controlling the message?
Jim sure as hell doesn't control what I say, nor does he control what you say or anyone else that cares to post here. Admit it and...
Get real!