Decaying Sotrefront at 13351 Madison
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:31 pm
The storefront at 13351 Madison is in horrible condition. The wood around it is rotting, the stucco is peeling off, and the walls are cracking (pictures below).
According to court records, the owner of this property was taken to court last year for not repairing the property. However, the law department made no attempt to serve a subpoena on the owner of the property, so the court had to dismiss the case.
It is interesting to note that the owner of this property put the property into an LLC and then used a registrant service to obscure the actual owner of the property. The only way to find out about the owner is through the tax mailing address. Apparently, he owns a house on Giel, a house on Lewis, the Edible Arrangements Building, and the building at 12603 Madison. None of these properties are in the LLC, however. They are all under his name.
The real question is: why did the law department make no effort to serve this landlord's subpoena? If I could find him in five minutes through public records, the law department certainly should be able to. Why is this allowed to continue? It is also worth noting that the property is $70,000 behind on its county property taxes. Where is Budish on this?
According to court records, the owner of this property was taken to court last year for not repairing the property. However, the law department made no attempt to serve a subpoena on the owner of the property, so the court had to dismiss the case.
It is interesting to note that the owner of this property put the property into an LLC and then used a registrant service to obscure the actual owner of the property. The only way to find out about the owner is through the tax mailing address. Apparently, he owns a house on Giel, a house on Lewis, the Edible Arrangements Building, and the building at 12603 Madison. None of these properties are in the LLC, however. They are all under his name.
The real question is: why did the law department make no effort to serve this landlord's subpoena? If I could find him in five minutes through public records, the law department certainly should be able to. Why is this allowed to continue? It is also worth noting that the property is $70,000 behind on its county property taxes. Where is Budish on this?