The hospital is not a single issue
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:46 am
Many have criticized those who oppose the City/LHA/CCF's plan for the hospital as being preoccupied by a single issue, especially State Senator and mayoral candidate Mike Skindell. But it's much more than that.
- It's an economic issue that will have a huge impact on the City's income tax revenues.
- It's an economic issue that will have a very large impact on downtown businesses.
- It's an economic issue because it is a very bad deal for Lakewood.
- It's a health and wellness issue - a medical office with a limited emergency room cannot replace a full service hospital.
- It's a life and death issue, as Brian Essi has so eloquently pointed out.
- It's a housing value issue because having a hospital makes our City a much more desirable place to live.
- It directly relates to drug problems, as it is the first stop for those who abuse drugs.
- It addresses the openness and competence of our City government, which has been detailed at length in other posts on the Deck. The failure to get buy-in from the residents, and to accommodate their views is just one thing. Another is the request for proposal process, which we were not given full and adequate information on. Will we ever know the real reason why Metro's proposal was not given more consideration?
I invite others to add to this list.
- It's an economic issue that will have a huge impact on the City's income tax revenues.
- It's an economic issue that will have a very large impact on downtown businesses.
- It's an economic issue because it is a very bad deal for Lakewood.
- It's a health and wellness issue - a medical office with a limited emergency room cannot replace a full service hospital.
- It's a life and death issue, as Brian Essi has so eloquently pointed out.
- It's a housing value issue because having a hospital makes our City a much more desirable place to live.
- It directly relates to drug problems, as it is the first stop for those who abuse drugs.
- It addresses the openness and competence of our City government, which has been detailed at length in other posts on the Deck. The failure to get buy-in from the residents, and to accommodate their views is just one thing. Another is the request for proposal process, which we were not given full and adequate information on. Will we ever know the real reason why Metro's proposal was not given more consideration?
I invite others to add to this list.