Page 1 of 3
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:39 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
At last night's council meeting Tom Bullock introduced legislation to allow Lakewoodites to keep chickens. This would be a very progressive act, as many more cities are making it legal. If we are to keep up with them we must allow this which is also a very green thing to do.
So that we can get a better feel of how it might work and feel we created this sign for outside of the DowntowN Area. As I had a friend that kept them illegally for years and he lived in the original "Clifton Park" I made sure this was historically accurate.
A
or
B
Please Vote Today
.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:11 pm
by jennifer scott
Not very nice Jim. Although, I know you think you are cute.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:23 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
I was corrected through a PM by a person that understands this.
.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:25 pm
by Gary Rice
Twang...
Ker-plunk...
pling!
our Kumbayah attempt seems to be a bit shaky lately....
Better tune up that banjo a bit more....
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:26 pm
by jennifer scott
Good luck Gary.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:30 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
Watch for more highlights from this discussion and sign ideas
in the upcoming Lakewood Observer.
.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:31 pm
by sharon kinsella
Now a sign might be needed for that. Unless they had a rooster that was crowing, people driving by wouldn't know it was there.
My Aunt and Grandmother lived on W. 114th when I was growing up and most of the neighbors had chickens. It was a normal thing to do.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:33 pm
by jennifer scott
Meow meow, that's tigress to you and you better knock it off .
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:35 pm
by jennifer scott
sharon kinsella wrote:Now a sign might be needed for that. Unless they had a rooster that was crowing, people driving by wouldn't know it was there.
My Aunt and Grandmother lived on W. 114th when I was growing up and most of the neighbors had chickens. It was a normal thing to do.
Sharon, Chickens don't bother me..but being called kitten? Back me up girlfriend, how degrading.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:37 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
jennifer scott wrote:Sharon, Chickens don't bother me..but being called kitten? Back me up girlfriend, how degrading.
After calling me and telling me the story about your uncle?!
And laughing?
.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:39 pm
by jennifer scott
Jim O'Bryan wrote:jennifer scott wrote:Sharon, Chickens don't bother me..but being called kitten? Back me up girlfriend, how degrading.
After calling me and telling me the story about your uncle?!
And laughing?
He is the ONLY one that called me that, it was very endearing from him. You? Not so sure.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:41 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
jennifer scott wrote:You? Not so sure.
Say it.
peace
.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:42 pm
by jennifer scott
Jim O'Bryan wrote:jennifer scott wrote:You? Not so sure.
Say it.
peace
.
OK, Ok, You're an ass.
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:46 pm
by Gary Rice
Please people,
After all, this IS the Deck.
Decorum Please?
I believe the proper Latin term might be equis posterior?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:47 pm
by jennifer scott
Gary Rice wrote:Please people,
After all, this IS the Deck.
Decorum Please?
I believe the proper Latin term might be equis posterior?
Sorry. You are right. Jim, You are an a$$. Meow.