Should City Workers Pay For Parking?
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:27 am
A couple of years ago selected citizens were appointed to the "parking lot" committee. There task was to analyze the cost and benefits of various City lots. When I suggested to one member of the committe that they take a look at the largest City owned parking lot he asked, "Which one?"
"The one behind City Hall", I answered.
I don't think he took me seriously!
Here is the proposal:
City workers pay $5 a day for parking. City workers who are Lakewood residents pay nothing for parking (think of it as a residency incentive).
The $350,000 raised each year could be used for parking lot mainenance and repairs. The money could also be used to fund the purchase of land for parking.
Encouraging people to live in the City where they work helps to save gas and the environment. Its not just about the money it's about the future, the environment and the children!
"The one behind City Hall", I answered.
I don't think he took me seriously!
Here is the proposal:
City workers pay $5 a day for parking. City workers who are Lakewood residents pay nothing for parking (think of it as a residency incentive).
The $350,000 raised each year could be used for parking lot mainenance and repairs. The money could also be used to fund the purchase of land for parking.
Encouraging people to live in the City where they work helps to save gas and the environment. Its not just about the money it's about the future, the environment and the children!