Page 1 of 1

A Lakewood Think Tank- Now's the time...

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 12:38 pm
by Gary Rice
It's been my perception that we have some outstanding contributors to this 'Deck. Some of us are right-wingers, some, lefties, some; Democrats, some; Republicans...some; who knows what? :lol:

All of us are interested in Lakewood, or we wouldn't be posting here in the first place.

My proposal here is that we start our own little think tank. My apologies if someone tried this before and I missed it. Rather than getting bogged down with the usual arguments pro and con, why don't we put some ideas out here that might be genuinely beneficial to the good of this city?

Although I'd love to kick this off with a "bring back the ice cream trucks!" outcry, my suggestion was that we establish a certificate and plaque for anyone whose home or storefront will have a 100th birthday this year.
(and for years past, and years to come, as they arrive)

It is my understanding that this proposal is being considered.

What else can we suggest that might make this place better?

We've done well (REAL well :roll: ) documenting some of the problems that we face. Now what do you say we come forward with a few citizen-initiated solution suggestions?

How 'bout it Lakewoodites?

...

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 1:17 pm
by Mark Crnolatas
Agreed.

I'd like to see a citizen watch group much like at least several hundred cities around the country are doing successfully. For this it takes some volunteers to be willing to enjoy our city, drive around appreciating what we have, visit different locations and while doing so, keep one eyeball open, a cell phone handy and some paper and a writing instrument, for reporting, if necessary, something to the police dept.

I'm willing to organize it, train it, ( especially in what not to do). I think JimOB is still interested in this less talk-more walk project too, so this could be a very easy project to contribute something back to our city.

Anyone else interested?

Mark C.

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 6:42 pm
by Kate McCarthy
Can we incorporate the idea of a neighborhood welcome wagon with the neighborhood watch? Then we can build community while looking out for each other.

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 4:25 pm
by Kenneth Warren
As I was considering Gary’s Rice’s call for a Think Tank, Kate McCarthy's Welcome Wagon, Stephen Calhoun’s Folk Anthropology, and Sean Wheeler’s concern for the racial divide, I came upon a relevant article in The American Prospect – “Can Block Clubs Block Despair?â€Â￾ by Eyal Press.

The article features something called “Collective Efficacyâ€Â￾ - “a theory that emphasizes the capacity of residents to overcome obstacles on the basis of shared expectations -- specifically, that they can work together for the common good.â€Â￾

I believe much of the LO practice and the Visionary Alignment, with the emphasis on real name statement, trust and social cohesion, could be considered as efforts to raise “Collective Efficacyâ€Â￾ levels in Lakewood.

We have only begun.

Perhaps we can consider research in Collective Efficacy and devise strategies that advance a sense of common skin in the Lakewood game, and a moral order of respectful interaction and reverance for the places we inhabit. This might begin a humane and sensible bridge to the racial divide that Sean featured in another thread.

There are good things happening in Plover Patch, the Birdtown Community Garden, which speaks precisely to collective efficacy. Sean’s Walk Across Lakewood is another strand. Walking and talking on the streets and in the parks. Growing a sense of subsistence together from the Lakewood earth - the LEAF Community.

As Press suggests, collective efficacy might provide a common middle ground for working though behavioral and structural perspectives that surfaced early in the race thread.

Here’s Press:

“…..Trees had been planted along the divider, and some of the dwellings sported their own gardens. At the entrance to the street was a sign: "Help Us Keep It Clean." It had been placed there by a block club, a grass-roots organization formed to encourage neighbors to meet and discuss their shared concerns. No major crimes had taken place on this street in recent memory, a fact St. Jean attributed to the higher level of trust and cohesion among its residents.

Can such a seemingly mundane factor explain why one block in a neighborhood is safer than another? For several decades, the debate over the myriad problems of America's inner cities has been dominated by two schools of thought: on one side, liberals who have emphasized the structural factors (racism, poverty) at their root; on the other, conservatives who've stressed the behavioral pathologies (out-of-wedlock birth, criminality) they believe are to blame. Yet over the past decade, a new theory has emerged to explain why some areas fare better than others even when their residents face similarly daunting odds. It stresses neither jobs nor personal behavior but something at once more elementary and more difficult to capture: the nature of the social interactions taking place among neighbors, and the degree to which they foster a shared capacity to solve problems and enforce collective norms.

These qualities appear to have a powerful effect on everything from the level of violence in a community to the conduct of adolescent youth to the likelihood that a neighborhood will remain poor, which is perhaps why a growing number of scholars and policy-makers are interested in teasing out what exactly fosters such traits.

The first indication of this dynamic came nearly a decade ago, in August 1997, when the journal Science published a seven-page article titled "Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy." It reported some findings from one of the largest social-science research experiments ever launched in the United States……â€Â￾

Another critical point to consider is the psycho-sexual development of young people – how lust screws into identity. Who is providing guidance here?

“…….Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, co-director of the Institute for Child and Family Policy at Columbia University, described the study's impact to me as "huge." Brooks-Gunn is a psychologist who studies childhood development. She has published papers showing that collective efficacy can play a role in delaying the age of sexual initiation among youth, particularly among adolescent girls.â€Â￾

For more:

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?art ... ck_despair


Kenneth Warren

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:21 pm
by Gary Rice
OK.

So far three real "thinking" posts....

How 'bout a few more?

Say, 30 posts...

Say, 300 posts...3000?

Plenty of room here for more cyber ants who want to, strike that, who WILL make a difference, here on our little virtual cyber-ant farm!

After all, wasn't it Harriet Tubman who, responding to a voice in the crowd that she bothered them no more than a flea, responded to the effect that that might be, but the Good Lord willing, she'd keep him scratching?

Make 'em scratch, Lakewoodites!

If others can think, we can too!

No limits for Lakewood here! Keep those positive ideas coming!

3 cheers for the first 3 posters; Mark, Kate and Ken!

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 1:23 am
by Stan Austin
:lol: Gary--- Im thinkin', I'm thinkin' but my brain ain't woikin'!

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:31 am
by Ivor Karabatkovic
you know what I'd like to see?

since it's memorial day and all...

I remember when Cpl. Dan Scherry of Rocky River passed away while serving, and how the whole community of RR put up ribbons at every possible corner, light post, and street sign.

Here in Lakewood you're lucky to find a yellow ribbon.

I'd like to see ribbons put up, even if it's just down all of detroit or something. Heck, I'd help to put them up.

just a thought. I like the idea of commemorating 100 year old houses though!