Citistat as a Waste of Time and Money
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:50 am
I read in the Sunpost that the City is busy "implementing" the Citistat program. The article was very vague (in the tradition of the Sun Post) about what actually was being done to implement the Citistat program.
The article made clear that the City did not anticipate any cost savings or operating efficiencies as a result of the program. I find it curious that Lakewood would seem to be the only city that I am aware of that does not expect any cost savings from this program. Other cities have saved millions. Why are we different?
The foundation of a successful Citistat program is a commitment to transparency and accountability. It seems the City wants the propaganda value of the "Program" without actually committing to the program.
I am now fully convinced that Mayor Tom George has chosen to manage the decline of the City and not its regeneration. The whole administration seems to be intent on protecting the status quo. One City official told me that a common response to a new idea is "The employees are not going to like thaaat."
That is unacceptable.
The article made clear that the City did not anticipate any cost savings or operating efficiencies as a result of the program. I find it curious that Lakewood would seem to be the only city that I am aware of that does not expect any cost savings from this program. Other cities have saved millions. Why are we different?
The foundation of a successful Citistat program is a commitment to transparency and accountability. It seems the City wants the propaganda value of the "Program" without actually committing to the program.
I am now fully convinced that Mayor Tom George has chosen to manage the decline of the City and not its regeneration. The whole administration seems to be intent on protecting the status quo. One City official told me that a common response to a new idea is "The employees are not going to like thaaat."
That is unacceptable.