Dan Alaimo wrote:Jim O'Bryan wrote:Dan Alaimo wrote:A related question is whether a hospital will be in network for the most insurance plans. At this time the Clinic is out of network for me and Metro is in. I think that weighs on people's decisions on what to support. The economic benefits of any hospital for the City of course benefit everybody regardless of whether they use the facility, so I support any arrangement that keeps the hospital here.
Another benefit is the city's health insurance is through the Clinic now.
.
I had wondered about that considering their strong bias toward the Clinic's proposal.
Dan
It is common for hospitals to insure city worker's in their city, and in turn the city gets a better deal. I am sure any hospital coming in, would do the same, and if you notice it is part of the "Master Agreement." There is value associated with it, so I do not want you mislead.
However the question is, is it worth it in this deal? I stand by our original numbers, compiled by two lawyers working with two health care admin professionals. These are the numbers the mayor said are wrong, and has never corrected.
The extremes of this deal, as my group (not SLH or Build Lakewood) read it, are trading $383 million in public assets for and immediate loss of $20 million, and another loss of $15 million to the city coffers over the next 10 years. Where these numbers come from, lawyers have found a total of $383 million in assets, using a wide description of assets in business law. Against the possible cost the City could be on the line for in removing all the buildings. plus taxes from workers. THESE ARE THE EXTREME NUMBERS TOGETHER SCARY
I have friends all over this thing, like I said back in January, a lot of good people get hurt on this. A damn good person, near the center of this nightmare called me in February to meet and get facts straight. My first question to test his honesty in this was, "Is there any money coming back to Lakewood that did not originate in Lakewood?" His answer was, "No."
When I run into people that are confused, I ask one simple question, it is the easiest way to think of this entire nightmare/civil war.
Chris Christie was under federal investigation for moving 42 orange cones on the George Washington Bridge. What if he had sold the bridge, a public asset, and funneled the money to a friend's yet unnamed non-profit in a 3-5 year secret deal?
Dan, you are a sharp guy, the city has never spent a penny on "Spin or crisis management" we are exceeding $1 million public dollars spent to manage us. I that the hallmark of a good deal?
The punchline is, whatever we lose, whatever the CITY does not get back, affects our taxes, and Corey's question of "out of pocket."
Sorry got a little winded here.