Page 1 of 1
Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 pm
by Brian Essi
According to Attorney General Mike DeWine "
if charitable assets are sold for less than fair market value, trustees may be held accountable for any shortfalls."
The LOI creates a huge potential personal liability for every LHA trustee. Of the $120 million or more in asset value, the amount received will be less that $40 million.
So each of the 23 trustees could be liable for about $3.5 million of the theoretical $80 million under market value liquidation sale prices in the LOI.
The LHA trustees voted to close the hospital without City Council approval resulted in losses through June 30th of $2.7 million. Each trustee could be liable for $117,000 for their role in causing assets to be diminished in value.
City Council won't save LHA from their own bad decisions--The new mayor and the City Council can chose to sue LHA and the trustees later for these losses. The trustees are in a box---that's why the LOI calls for a $2.5 million insurance premium to protect them---CCF is trying to protect their own on that "Board" too.
So it is time for the trustees pull up their big boy pants and take action to act like a real Board of Trustees instead of pawns of the Clinic and our misguided mayor.
Otherwise, if I were a trustee, I would check the LHA liability policy and my homeowners' umbrella policy and be holding on to my britches with both hands bracing for a wild ride in the coming months. Too late to transfer the house into the wife's name.
LHA Trustees need to "MAN UP" admit they are wrong and reverse course ASAP!
Some of the trustees have been on the "Board" so long---laughing and chuckling at recent meetings while real people are suffering and real money is being lost in their hands---checking their smart phones---missing meetings---coming late-----they have forgotten that LHA is a real charity in a real world with real consequences.
Continuing to follow Gable and Summers is a recipe for disaster--look at where these guys led the trustees so far?
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:36 pm
by cameron karslake
Brian,
Thanks, as always, for your research in bringing all these facets to life. I would be shaking in my boots if I were one of the 23 members! They obviously were not thinking about such things, kind of like not thinking about all the damage they were about to unleash back in January. It seems they thought the more damage they do, the quicker all this would be over.
Fat chance LHA! It's only just begun...
Accountability anyone?

(finally!)
Fascinating angle you have here, wow!
I hope Mr. Dewine holds true to his words down the road.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:39 pm
by Michael Deneen
cameron karslake wrote:I hope Mr. Dewine holds true to his words down the road.
Mr. DeWine would lock up the 2018 Gubernatorial Race if he looked into this case.
But is he willing to buck the Clinic?
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:43 pm
by marklingm
From page 2 of the "Guide for Charity Board Members," the OAG explains that being an LHA Trustee is more than an honor:
Charities are required by law to have board members to ensure integrity and
accountability in their governance. They may be called by different titles — board member, trustee, or director — but they have the same important responsibilities. Organizations seek community members to serve in this capacity for several reasons, including:
· Honoring an individual’s previous volunteer services or commitment to those the charity serves.
· Adding credibility to the board through an individual’s management and business skills.
· Strengthening an organization through an individual’s significant contacts.
· Increasing the variety and level of skills on the board.
Agreeing to serve on a board comes with a great deal of responsibility and can provide a very satisfying experience. Before accepting, prospective board members should investigate what the commitment will entail in order to understand the role, function, and responsibilities of being a member of a charity’s governing body.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:47 pm
by marklingm
From pages 2-3 of the "Guide for Charity Board Members," the OAG explains that LHA Trustee have legal duties:
Trustees and directors of charitable organizations have fiduciary obligations to ensure that the mission of the organization is honored and that resources of the group are used wisely in support of that purpose.
The Ohio Attorney General’s Office has the duty to ensure that the interests of those who benefit from the charity’s work are protected. In fact, this is one of the oldest duties of attorneys general and goes back centuries in common law tradition. Statutory provisions expand on that authority.
The duties of trustees also are long-standing. Statutory provisions spell out those responsibilities in the Ohio nonprofit corporation code provisions (Ohio Revised Code Section 1702). For organizations that have sought and received tax-exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service, there also are federal requirements pertaining to board members’ fiduciary duties.
The responsibilities center on paying attention, being good stewards, and acting in the best interest of the organization. Board members are guardians of the trust, serving on behalf of the community, regardless of personal interests. These duties apply whether or not the group is formally incorporated. They apply whenever an organization presents itself to the public as honoring or advancing a charitable cause. Trustees have the same obligations to their organization whether the group’s budget is $100 or $100 million.
Board members bring new ideas into organizations, provide oversight and guidance on mission and objectives, and help a successful group remain relevant and healthy. The lack of an active and engaged board can doom the future of a nonprofit organization.
Failure to follow through on the legal duties of board membership can have devastating consequences for a charitable organization. There also may be civil or criminal penalties levied against board members who shirk their responsibilities, particularly in situations in which they have benefitted from their action or inaction.
The fiduciary obligations of board members fall under four specific legal duties:
Duty of care
Duty of compliance
Duty of loyalty
Duty to maintain accounts
You will want to read the various duties from pages 3-7 and the consequences on page 7.
Of course, the LHA Trustees should have already read the entire "Guide for Charity Board Members" and how to keep a strong board as outlined by the OAG on page 7.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:53 pm
by marklingm
Oh ...
... by the way ...
... you can reach this guy ...

... by going to ...
http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2015 6:52 pm
by Kate McCarthy
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:20 am
by Missy Limkemann
Wait...I am a charity...a 501 as a matter of fact. And there were things I bought thru my charity and after a while either took them to the scrap yard (and got a few bucks) or just plain threw them out. So now you are saying me personally will have to pay that back? The kennel runs I purchased years ago for xx amount of dollars are so not worth that now....I would be lucky to get 1/4 of what I paid for them...so you are saying I have to pay that back?
Just trying to understand....
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:01 am
by Jim O'Bryan
Missy Limkemann wrote:Wait...I am a charity...a 501 as a matter of fact. And there were things I bought thru my charity and after a while either took them to the scrap yard (and got a few bucks) or just plain threw them out. So now you are saying me personally will have to pay that back? The kennel runs I purchased years ago for xx amount of dollars are so not worth that now....I would be lucky to get 1/4 of what I paid for them...so you are saying I have to pay that back?
Just trying to understand....
Missy
The Lakewood Hospital Association sole purpose was to run the PUBLICLY OWNED Hospital. In their charter/agreement
with the City of Lakewood they would return the building, property and business in "as good or better condition" then
when they took over. This would be no different than leasing a house.
Your business is not running anything publicly owned.
Think of LHA as the leasing agent.
Another bit to think about is that LHA and LHF have more than enough cash money on hand right now to repair the
old building and have a reserve that could run the hospital at the current manufactured loses for 3-5 years.
The entire failure was not only orchestrated, and approved by the LHA, they stand to reap the second largest harvest
of funding from the failure they caused. Likewise, LHF walks away with a pocketful of cash when the money was
mostly raised for capital improvements on the property WE ALL OWN.
1) They hospital is failing by design, and conspiracy - in lawsuit
2) None of these people should ever be in management or overseeing of any public trust again.
I hope this clears things up.
If you abuse a dog until it needs to be put down, should you be allowed to own another dog ever?
.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:35 am
by Missy Limkemann
Oh ok... I got scared for a minute....I was like crap...I just spent 8 grand saving a dogs life....we are tapped out...and personally I am tapped out saving this dog's life. LOL.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:36 am
by Lori Allen _
I agree with Jim that none of the LHA trustees should be in a position of public trust again. I think Jim's analogy about the abused dog is a good one. What somewhat shocks me is that John Litten is actually running for City Council in Lakewood this year. From what I have been told, he is not disclosing that he serves on the LHA Board of Trustees and that he is in favor of getting rid of the hospital.
Curt Broskey, another LHA Trustee is the director at The Westerly, better known as the Lakewood Senior Citizens Inc. Other LHA members, CCF members, and other well-known probable friends of the mayor are also serving on this board.
In my opinion, the LHA and CCF have too much power in the City of Lakewood. I feel that it is time for a fresh start.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:52 pm
by Amy Martin
I'm going off topic but have to put a plug in for Missy's group. My partner and I just adopted a chihuahua puppy from All Dog's Heaven. The experience was wonderful. We were thoroughly screened and chosen from a large field of applicants. Working with Missy and her volunteer foster, Tracie, has been wonderful. We couldn't be happier with our new addition, Paco.
I would encourage anyone who reads this forum who also loves animals to consider making a monetary contribution to Missy's group. These folks use money out of their own pockets to save animals lives. This is a great organization based right here in Lakewood.
Re: Time For LHA Trustees to Pull Up Their Big Boy Pants
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:31 pm
by Michael Deneen
Amy Martin wrote:I would encourage anyone who reads this forum who also loves animals to consider making a monetary contribution to Missy's group. These folks use money out of their own pockets to save animals lives. This is a great organization based right here in Lakewood.
I agree Amy.
Missy is simply a great human being.
I encourage you to post this as a separate thread (so people tired of hospital news will see it).
I also encourage you or Missy to submit a print article to the paper...I'm sure the community will step up.