Valerie Molinski wrote:"We want a vibrant, active city.
But no new development."
"We want our old buildings that have been abandoned by their owners not to lay fallow, rot, and blight our neighborhoods.
But only if it is being reused for something we deem appropriate and like."
"We want amenities to stay and come to Lakewood so that we don't have to drive out to Crocker Park for a pair of pants and a beer.
But only if it doesnt inconvenience the fastest path to my garage. And only if it is something *I* personally would use."
"We want our neighborhoods to be walkable and bikeable.
But only as long as you do not inconvenience me in my car."
I think about all of these things as my commute gets longer as we now have more people living on the near west side. I think about how it's harder to find a street spot when I need one because Lakewood has so much going on. I think about this as reasons I chose Lakewood in which to live because I didn't want to live in a town where there was only housing developments and nothing else nearby. Growing pains and the trade offs made. Only an individual can personally decide what they think is right, important, or what changes they are willing to put up with.
Lakewood, with its density and mixed development, always has to walk a fine line in this way and hope to strike the right balance. Whether or not one agrees with the new balances being struck is entirely subjective.
Valerie
First I have never said I am against any commercial economic development in this city.
So let's throw that one away, I tied myself to no schools, theaters or empty car lots to
stop commercial economic development.
I am against the city continually lying and misrepresenting the truth to us. Like McDonald's
which was 100% developed by the city and taken to McDonald's so that the Bin could stay
competitive.
However we do have a city with no plan, that came completely out of the thought ONLY
COMMERCIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT can keep us whole, which means our taxes low.
And it is just BS, 100% BS. Where are the benefits from burning millions and millions
downtown? They do not exist. Actually we are finding out that with commercial
development costs more that anyone thought to maintain, and that with our completely
hacked to death City Hall, they do not have the ability to manage the new flow.
As far as driving to Crocker Park? It is a 15 minute drive at best. In Rush hour in the county
you can make it to Legacy Village in 27 minutes. I have spent more time than that on
on-ramps in Chicago, New York, Detroit, etc. It is all BS, and we share taxes from Crocker
Park, and Legacy Village already, so we do not need to create another mall here.
The fines line Lakewood walks, or has fallen over like a drunk at a Frat Party, keep
Commercial Businesses out of the residential parts of the community. Seems easy enough
to understand. NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE NEXT TO MCDONALDS.
I was talking with some "civic leaders" today about poverty in Lakewood, Ian Andrews head
of LakewoodAlive nailed it. Housing is what will retain Lakewood's value, not bars. And
anything that brings down home values should be looked at very, very, very carefully.
But the City, especially Planning and Development, a department that is incapable of either
has turned into the county sluts, give us anything, anything at all, we will put it somewhere.
The City of Lakewood has lost its way.
To go back to the original question. The neighborhood is making its way for bar patrons,
because a bar was put in where there was not enough parking, which should have sent
signals out to all the Boards, this is a stupid illegal according to them idea. If you have a
sports bar, what it really is with 200 seats, only an idiot would put it where there is parking
for 50, 75, or so. Which was always the case with this built 100% on lies nightmare.
.