Jim O'Bryan wrote:Pushed as answers by people that are PAID BIG DOLLARS to push regionalism, and sell their communities out like Indian Scouts did to Custer and Indian fighters. This is the new, not really, snake oil.
Our "leadership" here in Northeastern Ohio is pushing regionalism and so called "sustainable communities" because it gives the appearance of taking action.
The BEST case scenario for Northeast Ohio is that in 20 years the population will be the same as it is now. The most likely scenario is that the region will continue to lose population, economic activity and political clout. I'll go out on a limb and say just about everyone in any leadership capacity thinks the region we will continue to decline.
The leadership will try to say the right words, "sustainable, smart, rebuild the urban core, dispersal is bad, it makes no sense to abandoned billions of investment to spend billions more to build what we already have". However, we should judge them not by the buzz words they use but by the actions they take.
NOACCA is funding and supporting new and improved and expanded freeways and exits in Lorain, Lake, Geuaga and Medina Counties.
RTA , funded by Cuyahoga County taxpayers, is expanding its service to Lake, Medina and Lorain Counties.
Tri-c, funded by Cuyahoga County taxpayers, is expanding into Medina and Lorain County.
The Cleveland Clinic is engaged in a policy of denuding Lakewood of doctors and specialists and transferring them to Lorain County.
Cuyahoga County is subsidizing the construction of hotels, restaurants and office buildings in Downtown Cleveland with the intent to take business from the surrounding inner ring suburbs.
Those are just the DIRECT actions of our so called leading institutions.
Then there are the polices of homeless resettlement, the conversion of apartments into halfway houses and public housing policies that degrade the quality of life in cities like Lakewood.
Their answer to the problems aggravated by their very own policies? To create another taxpayer funded advocacy group to lead the propaganda effort designed to give voters the impression that the situation is under control.
How can we take them seriously when they create an entity called the Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium that gives Ashtabula and Sandusky a seat at the table?
If I lived in Ashtabula I would want my City to have a seat at the table for one reason: To keep the current policy of subsidized sprawl going as long as possible.
Of course I might be overly cynical.
Maybe the Mayors of Akron and Ashtabula and Youngstown sit down at the meeting and say “We need to halt all this development in our communities because urban sprawl is bad!” Really?
I might start to take the Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium seriously if they start to criticize the actions of RTA, Tri-c, The Cleveland Clinic, University Hospitals and NOACCA and Mental Health Services and the various housing agencies and their block busting tactics. Don't hold your breathe.
Another question no one wants to answer:
If our institutions are heading for the exits why should the people stay behind?
Here is a riddle:
117th and Clifton is one of the busiest corners in Cuyahoga County. More people live within a ten minute walk of that area than all of downtown. Why isn't that area eligible for even a fraction of the subsidies given to downtown?
The question provides its own answer. The question also provides a clue as to why the downtown only development model is causing so much damage.