Tim Liston wrote:Looks to me like this article might be a couple years old. What I see is a drawing and when you access the full plan you see a lot of detail as to the endeavor and its proposed cost (around $30 million). Steve, Jim, do either of you have any idea how far along Euclid is along this plan? It there a big beach yet? Do they have all the land that they need? How are the new public accessways going? Is the Park amphitheater done yet? I presume all the funding is in place....
Tim
I see Steve has already answered.
Euclid, and I believe correctly, has understood that the Lake, and developing the lakefront
for the entire city is a financially solid idea, and something worth banking on. Cleveland
believes that the lakefront is worth developing and banking on. It would seem the only
city that has NEVER looked at developing the lakefront, and what it could bring is Lakewood.
Which is because so many of our civic leaders see the lakefront as "theirs." There are no
studies on extending the Gold Coast, something that makes sense IF and it is a big IF a
developer could be found. We have no study, we have refused to even look at it for
decades. So we look away from our best bet for a financial future for the entire city,
because of a few, that will say they want what is best for the city...
So finally a woman does an extensive study of an area she loves, and figures out that we
could create another $250 million in taxable properties, and she is given a pat on the head
and dismissed like some petulant child. Are we really to believe that $250 million+ in new
property will not save us but 5 Guys, McDonalds, Taco Bell can.
Yeah they want whats is best for Lakewood, as long as it is not in their neighborhood...
.