Meg Ostrowski wrote:I should have put quote marks around graffiti in my earlier post, as I consider it a public art form, different from vandalism, the criminal act of destruction of property, which I believe fueled this thread.
In my time here, Lakewood has evolved from traditional suburban to suburban with an urban vibe. I welcome the change, secure in the knowledge that we are protected by some of the best law enforcement services the region has to offer when anyone crosses the line.
It is no surprise that with this progression there has been an increase in public expression through the defacement of property and installments of public art.
We welcome a mural at The Beck Center.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=10408We celebrate public art.
http://lakewoodobserver.com/read/2011/0 ... s-sculptorWe encourage artists to participate in the West End Halloween Window Walk.
http://www.lakewoodchamber.org/site/ima ... 20Form.pdfSo what makes art valid? Permisson? Funding? Mass appeal?
I have often wondered about the flag painted on rock as seen from eastbound Route 2 near Amherst, the concrete and tile work at the small park across from the West Side Market and the image of the sun surrounding the underpass across from Edgewater as seen from the Shoreway.
Meg
Being invited?
I would say the difference between Beck and the now legitimized art form "graffiti," which
is still vandalism. The art at the Beck was not just put up. It was approved by the people that
own the property, they have also made sure it can go back to the way it was, with very
little effort.
"Graffiti" style is a legitimate art form and always has been, as all art is legitimate, it is
merely the act against another (the property owner, and the community). But a Keith Haring,

Holds up in print, and on paper.
First, art is nearly always in the eye of the beholder, one person art is another person's pain.
This is magnified, when the owner of the property, does not agree with the message. Then
it becomes the owners pain and loss, which amounts to making them buy art(cost of removal)
that they never wanted.
I can say I have seen some beautiful "graffiti" but I never thought it was right.
Which brings us to public "graffiti" I usually see this appearing in towns that have lost the
battle against graffiti, and their lower class brothers and sisters the taggers. A community
embraces and then amplifies its "graffiti" to hide the fact they have lost the battle.
There are thousands of cool activities for kids, that underline just how cool "graffiti" is. I
always go back to a person brought in to help with the opening of the Library. His consultant
idea was to put up a wall similar to the library, and let kids tag it! There were people at the
table, responsible people, thinking, "hey that is kind of cool." They did not think, what was
actually being taught to the wee ones. "Have an idea, come write it on the side of the library."
This is why the story of of "saving graffiti on my facebook page" is so egregious,
"graffiti" and this was actually "tagging" can never be legitimized in public space unless...
... it has been invited, as it is in Halloween Window Painting. One could argue, that the
library wall was invited, but it just seemed so wrong, a wall like the library, spray paint.
Which draws us back to this thread. Tony Sinagra waged a war on graffiti and ugliness on
the streets. He made it a priority. A parking meter looking bad, paint it. Bus shelter with
graffiti, tell CTS clean it or remove the shelter. He understood the value of a clean, safe
street. Now the mayor, and council will talk about cost, and they are right it is a terrible
expense in labor and materials to clean up. Which is why a zero tolerance has to be set,
and maintained. Because when it is allowed to build, it becomes cost prohibitive, and we
will hear, "we have to close the parks, we have to remove the slide...
Which brings me to another interesting thing. No graffiti by the basketball hoops, or the
baseball field. Which would indicate to me this is being done in daylight hours, and should
be on the video camera 10' from the area.
Meg this is not a referendum on Friends of Kauffman Park.
A city's job, CLEAN, SAFE
FWIW
.