The Observation Deck

kate e parker wrote:he local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Essi has presented facts....including the Internet history that shows campaigning from City Hall.

You and Corey have yet to address any of the actual facts presented here....just a lot of diversionary posts.

Michael Deneen wrote:

kate e parker wrote:he local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Essi has presented facts....including the Internet history that shows campaigning from City Hall.

You and Corey have yet to address any of the actual facts presented here....just a lot of diversionary posts.

Mike,

I'm not sure the second part of your first sentence is entirely accurate. The incomplete public record shows interenet activity that accessed a site that was used to promote the Summers agenda and campaign.

I am reporting new facts in the most accurate way I can for the public consumption.

cmager wrote:

kate e parker wrote:the local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Something about the local news being co-opted by the need for advertising $$

I thought you were going to spend some time trying to actually link me to Team Summers.

Go ahead, I'm waiting.

Don't forget to include some substance.

Brian Essi wrote:Mike,

I'm not sure the second part of your first sentence is entirely accurate. The incomplete public record shows interenet activity that accessed a site that was used to promote the Summers agenda and campaign.

I am reporting new facts in the most accurate way I can for the public consumption.

Fair enough.

Brian Essi wrote:

Michael Deneen wrote:

kate e parker wrote:he local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Essi has presented facts....including the Internet history that shows campaigning from City Hall.

Mike,

I'm not sure the second part of your first sentence is entirely accurate. The incomplete public record shows interenet activity that accessed a site that was used to promote the Summers agenda and campaign.

not sure. not sure? sounds super-lawyery. well, i'm no lawyer but i'm guessing that you better get your zombies in line before they overstep with their "facts".

Corey Rossen wrote:

cmager wrote:

kate e parker wrote:the local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Something about the local news being co-opted by the need for advertising $$

I thought you were going to spend some time trying to actually link me to Team Summers. Go ahead, I'm waiting. Don't forget to include some substance.

Did you know that not every post is about you.

cmager wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

cmager wrote:

kate e parker wrote:the local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Something about the local news being co-opted by the need for advertising $$

I thought you were going to spend some time trying to actually link me to Team Summers. Go ahead, I'm waiting. Don't forget to include some substance.

Did you know that not every post is about you.

Don't forget the substance.

cmager wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

cmager wrote:

kate e parker wrote:the local news won't even cover this. something about facts.

Something about the local news being co-opted by the need for advertising $$

I thought you were going to spend some time trying to actually link me to Team Summers. Go ahead, I'm waiting. Don't forget to include some substance.

Did you know that not every post is about you.

It's okay to admit that you have no substance and that I am not a part of Team Summers.

Go ahead. Admit it.

haven't you geniuses figured out that calling me a troll will not make me go away?

contrary to popular deck belief, I do this for free!

Bridget Conant wrote:

image.jpeg

Aren't you the one who said, "you fell for the bait - fool."

You are an self-admitting troll! Hilarious!

more memes please!

Still not one person who can refute or dispute this as a fact.

Do we pay for and/or endorse our city hiring people with criminal backgrounds, one that involves total disrespect for other human beings BTW, and apparently no related experience for the job category, for a reason that we don't yet know?

No wonder people suspect it might have been a political hire. What other conclusion can be reached based on real evidence - overlooked criminal background, did not have prior experience in the subject area. Then it appears there is evidence that city computers were used to access that employee's own media site during work hours.

What other conclusion could a reasonable person make about this evidence?

Crickets and tumble weeds?

Bridget Conant wrote:Still not one person who can refute or dispute this as a fact.

Do we pay for and/or endorse our city hiring people with criminal backgrounds, one that involves total disrespect for other human beings BTW, and apparently no related experience for the job category, for a reason that we don't yet know?

No wonder people suspect it might have been a political hire. What other conclusion can be reached based on real evidence - overlooked criminal background, did not have prior experience in the subject area. Then it appears there is evidence that city computers were used to access that employee's own media site during work hours.

What other conclusion could a reasonable person make about this evidence?

.

Bumped. At the risk of being inundated with Casey Kasem's top 100 hits from whenever...