Page 6 of 7
Re: palin turning off moms
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:32 pm
by jennifer scott
Stephen Eisel wrote:jennifer scott wrote:Well Justine,
At least I will be in good company. Colleen is as solid as they come and I can't think of too many people who's company I would enjoy more.
cough cough cough cough
I am so sorry Stephen, I like your company too!!!!

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:33 pm
by Justine Cooper
then you two should be very happy together!
but seriously, this post was about palin and moms, not colleen and moms and yes she made it about her and opened it up. if you want to keep avoid the issues of palin i guess keep talking about yourself colleen.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:36 pm
by Ivor Karabatkovic
Jennifer,
You two would make the perfect couple!
palin turning off mom's
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:38 pm
by jennifer scott
Well thanks Justine!
I think Colleen and I are very happy.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:40 pm
by Justine Cooper
it shows
palin turning off moms
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:41 pm
by jennifer scott
Thanks to you too Ivor!!!

Gosh Colleen, I guess we are just about the happiest of friends or couples or however anyone chooses to now define us!
Re: palin turning off mom's
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:41 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Re: palin turning off mom's
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:44 pm
by Ivor Karabatkovic
Stephen Eisel wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkVM-jGNn04
Stephen, good song.
"Happy together":

palin turning off moms
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:46 pm
by jennifer scott
Stephen,
An extra cigar to you my friend!!!!!

Great link.
Re: palin turning off mom's
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 7:47 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Ivor Karabatkovic wrote:Stephen Eisel wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkVM-jGNn04
Stephen, good song.
"Happy together":


Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:06 pm
by sharon kinsella
I will agree with you Jennifer, Colleen is indeed solid.

palin turning off moms
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:09 pm
by jennifer scott
sharon kinsella wrote:I will agree with you Jennifer, Colleen is indeed solid.

See Sharon, we do agree on some things, that is what I love about you. You get it.

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:04 pm
by Stephen Eisel
I was just watching MSNBC and they were discussing a possible conflict of interest because Gwen Ifill has a book coming out in January about politics and Obama. People are saying that she can't be a neutral moderator. It was brought up that perhaps this information is being released now so when Palin falls flat on her face there will be another excuse. That makes sense to me. I am getting tired of all the excuses
double standards ?????
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/05/31 ... 0925.shtml
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:45 pm
by Danielle Masters
Double standard by who?
Since you used my quote I hope you are not talking about me. I was merely asking a question. To me it seems that when Palin screws up there are always excuses and it seems like this is all being set up before hand so if/when she screws up there is a scapegoat.
Another question, since the moderators were approved up by both candidates before hand, when was Ifill's book written? It just seems that too timely that this information was revealed so near the time of the debate.
Damn this election is turning me into a conspiracy nut.
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:46 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Hey... I was also asking a question??????