Page 6 of 7

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:21 am
by Corey Rossen
Jim O'Bryan wrote:
Corey Rossen wrote: I have read them. Repeatedly. I wonder if you or moderators have.

I get it, everything is your/moderators discretion. This includes profanity, bumps, harassment, bullying, etc.

Enough discussion on this, nothing will change as we all can see. Someone just slipped in the word "pissed" into a post and nothing was done - see, nothing changes. Your discretion, I get it.

Corey

I went back and looked, no one has registered a complaint on profanity, bumps(? really), harassment, or bullying.

NO ONE, not even you, EVER.

Are you telling me, that you want me to take actions on my own? I get total discretion. You would support that every time?

Corey, you can't have it both ways.

As I have said, time and time again, read the rules you agreed too, read the new rules we are considering/trying.

.
Enough already, this is getting, and has been, old for all of us. Jim = Observer/Deck. Jim may or may not = Moderator. Therefore Jim is either one or both, but either way Jim is an "us." See below.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:

The rule the Deck has been under since day one.
Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us.

You agree that “The Observation Deck” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit.

Potential New Rules

By registering at the Lakewood Observer Message Boards, users agree that any post deemed inappropriate may be removed at the sole discretion of the Lakewood Observer. Lakewood Observer also has the right, at its sole discretion, to revoke board privileges at any time without notice or reason.


Flaming, Bashing, Trolling, and Spam
Determination of flaming, trolling, and spam posts will be made at the discretion of mods.

Hacking, Scripting, and Altering Board Code
Accessing or using someone else's account is strictly prohibited. Hmmm. These actions are grounds for an immediate and permanent ban. Hmmm.

Bans
We only will discuss the nature, reason, and length of a ban with the user banned.

Questionable Content
Since we can't have a rule to cover everything, this is the rule to, well, cover everything.

These issues are left to the discretion of individual moderators, but may include any material that is knowingly false and/or defamatory, misleading, spammy, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, sexist, obscene, racist, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, that otherwise violates any law, or that encourages conduct constituting a criminal offense.

There are hundreds of of posts each day on the Lakewood Observer message boards, so we can't always promise you'll receive a warning every time action has to be taken. By registering at the Lakewood Observer Message Boards, users agree that any post deemed inappropriate may be removed at the sole discretion of Lakewood Observer.
These are the rules you wrote, or wrote in collaboration, or agreed to, or signed off on. I have read them. There is nothing wrong with the rules, they protect the business as they should. I think the business forgets what is in the rules. Or the business has an identity crisis while changing between hats. either way, the business is trying to have it all. Whoever the business is.

Discretion. Lakewood Observer. We.

Now, enough already. Move along.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 11:24 am
by cmager
Corey Rossen wrote:
cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen,
This is truly heart-rending. Here's the difference.

You are talking about various aspects of being a victim, and/or purposely blowing up threads with which you and your team disagree. You can't seem to get unstuck from doing so, or it is indeed your purpose.

Most others on The Deck are talking about and sharing pictures of clouds, fauna, and nature. Most others are talking about community issues like trash, politics, hospitals, schools and high schools, athletics, city services, city hall, people in the city, businesses, roads and traffic, restaurants and food, weather, the performing arts, music, history, trees, parks, signs, homes, events...shared experiences. These are things of interest, often vital to the community of Lakewood. I have frequently referred to this as content.

I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction.
Hmm...this interested you enough to post.
Move along.

Enough already, move along and talk about your picture of clouds with fauna on the trees over a pile of trash near the hospital and down the street from a school athletic field that is being poorly serviced by the city services of City Hall while your business is suffering due to bad roads and traffic because of bad weather...because from I can tell, you lack content by your own definition. Check your posts again. Every. Single. One. Of. Them. While you are at it, check to see who is calling themselves victims time and time again. Then check again to see if those same people are trying to halt the freedom of speech. Then check again to see who is blowing up threads, or even more unoriginal - bumping and then bumping and then bumping again. I believe that is stuck in a rut by sheer repetition alone.

I have no purpose, what is yours? Please do tell, because apparently you have one in all of your mundane posts about nothing - you're like Seinfeld of Lakewood.

Move along.
I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction. << So, this is confirmed.
But by all means make sure you get the last word.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2016 12:21 pm
by Corey Rossen
cmager wrote:
Corey Rossen wrote:
cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen,
This is truly heart-rending. Here's the difference.

You are talking about various aspects of being a victim, and/or purposely blowing up threads with which you and your team disagree. You can't seem to get unstuck from doing so, or it is indeed your purpose.

Most others on The Deck are talking about and sharing pictures of clouds, fauna, and nature. Most others are talking about community issues like trash, politics, hospitals, schools and high schools, athletics, city services, city hall, people in the city, businesses, roads and traffic, restaurants and food, weather, the performing arts, music, history, trees, parks, signs, homes, events...shared experiences. These are things of interest, often vital to the community of Lakewood. I have frequently referred to this as content.

I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction.
Hmm...this interested you enough to post.
Move along.

Enough already, move along and talk about your picture of clouds with fauna on the trees over a pile of trash near the hospital and down the street from a school athletic field that is being poorly serviced by the city services of City Hall while your business is suffering due to bad roads and traffic because of bad weather...because from I can tell, you lack content by your own definition. Check your posts again. Every. Single. One. Of. Them. While you are at it, check to see who is calling themselves victims time and time again. Then check again to see if those same people are trying to halt the freedom of speech. Then check again to see who is blowing up threads, or even more unoriginal - bumping and then bumping and then bumping again. I believe that is stuck in a rut by sheer repetition alone.

I have no purpose, what is yours? Please do tell, because apparently you have one in all of your mundane posts about nothing - you're like Seinfeld of Lakewood.

Move along.
I honestly don't think you'll get the distinction. << So, this is confirmed.
But by all means make sure you get the last word.
Long-winded "bump?"
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Exploiting loopholes to circumvent rules will also result in a ban.
:wink:

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 10:06 am
by Brian Essi
Irony

The evidence establishes that this thread was started due to conduct by two people.

It had been perpetuated by one of those two people while that same person continues to suggest that the thread should end ...yet that same person cannot let anyone else have the last word to end the thread.

Truly ironic.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 10:54 am
by cmager
Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:04 am
by Bridget Conant
If you read between the lines of his "messages," he's trying to get certain people to say or "admit" things that he and his team believe are true, but are in fact, falsehoods.

Why don't you grow some cojones, Corey, and tell whoever is pulling your strings to get a pair of their own?

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:16 am
by Corey Rossen
Bridget Conant wrote:If you read between the lines of his "messages," he's trying to get certain people to say or "admit" things that he and his team believe are true, but are in fact, falsehoods.

Why don't you grow some cojones, Corey, and tell whoever is pulling your strings to get a pair of their own?
Huh?

ps You are ruining your team's stance that I want last word by asking me to respond. :wink:

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:22 am
by Corey Rossen
Brian Essi wrote:Irony

The evidence establishes that this thread was started due to conduct by two people.

It had been perpetuated by one of those two people while that same person continues to suggest that the thread should end ...yet that same person cannot let anyone else have the last word to end the thread.

Truly ironic.
If I always must be on the defensive it is hard to allow others the last word. Isn't that why the antagonist or agitator always wants the last word, to win, right? Stop trying to win and I can stop posting. Had you left it where it was and not mention me, so that you are forcing me to come back on and post, who is really at fault? Hint: think mirror.

Technically, this should be the last word because, through experience, I have learned that you view questions and question marks as irrelevant.

Go ahead, have last word - I don't care. Just don't do it in a fashion where I don't need to come back and post something. I triple-dog-dare you to pull that off.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 12:47 pm
by Dan Alaimo
period. (?)

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:30 pm
by cmager
cmager wrote:Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Contriving a reason, and then insisting on having the #lastword is amongst the behaviors to which you appear to be blind. Enough already.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:37 pm
by Corey Rossen
cmager wrote:
cmager wrote:Said individual has this long-running signature (below), yet claims no ill will towards The LO and The Deck. Clearly acting as a provocateur to damage The LO and the public service it performs. Enough already. #lastword

"I have neither aligned myself with SLH, nor BL." ~ Jim O'Bryan
"I am not neutral." ~Jim O'Bryan
"I am not here to stir up anything." ~Jim O'Bryan
Contriving a reason, and then insisting on having the #lastword is amongst the behaviors to which you appear to be blind. Enough already.
I hope this amuses you as much as it amuses me. Stop already, you are breaking the #lastword rules of engagement. Apparently, you just don't get it.

Stop!

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 2:44 pm
by Bridget Conant
Your repeated nonsensical, childish, whiny posts are doing far more damage to your reputation than anyone calling your sponsors (if it even happened.) Did you ever hear of Google?

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:00 pm
by Corey Rossen
Bridget Conant wrote:Your repeated nonsensical, childish, whiny posts are doing far more damage to your reputation than anyone calling your sponsors (if it even happened.) Did you ever hear of Google?
Again. It is very simple...leave me out of it and I stay away.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:14 pm
by Bridget Conant
No, you interject yourself repeatedly of your own accord.

Anyone reading these threads and viewing your posts gets a good picture of your personality.

Have at it. Google loves it.

Re: New Rules For The Deck Needed?

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:19 pm
by Corey Rossen
Bridget Conant wrote:No, you interject yourself repeatedly of your own accord.
Nope.