Will Brown wrote:Why is it that liberals rail about government restrictions, while at the same time advocating government restrictions.
You can't see it, but I'm shaking my head.
.
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
Will Brown wrote:Why is it that liberals rail about government restrictions, while at the same time advocating government restrictions.
J Hrlec wrote: ... Utopia where 100% of the people automatically do the right thing!
Peter Grossetti wrote:J Hrlec wrote: ... Utopia where 100% of the people automatically do the right thing!
John - Can't a person "set the bar" REALLY high? Your pessimism won't deter me. Please let this child of the 60's/70's cling to his dreams.
J Hrlec wrote:... mix dreams with a lot of realism
J Hrlec wrote:unreasonably unattainable
J Hrlec wrote:All input is appreciated.
Betsy Voinovich wrote:TRUST YOUR RESIDENTS.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Councilman Anderson
As always thank you for reaching out here.
If I may be so bold...
Numbers might be put best per season, per month. I think back to where I needed 5 just
to empty my uncle's house, and think, I would have hated to wait months to do it.
I would rather see the number of sales increase, and keep Sunday off the length of sales.
Call me old fashion, but I believe even if we are not religious we can all use a quiet day.
I applaud you for coming up with an actual time to start and stop, instead of vague
references to the moon or sun and where it is in the sky.
Once again thank you for participating.
Christopher Bindel wrote:
Thealexa Becker wrote:Jim,
Let me paraphrase what you just said in your first paragraph there.
"Councilman Anderson is my friend, therefore I will not be combative with him."
I "get it".
I wanted to inform people that if you have a sign up that says...free items....yard sale....lost pet it will be taken down. I put up 6 signs for a yard sale, and while my husband was putting them up he noticed a cop taking down the one he put up down the street, he followed the cop and saw him then take down a reward poster for a dog that was on a tree. I called Police Dept and was told, that it is lakewood city ordinance that you cant not have any signs posters up on telephone poles, tree lawns, the side of streets on trees, basically she said the only place you can place signs is in your own yard or a neghbors yard from whom you may get permission from.So basically this police officer spends his mornings everyday taking down harmless pieces of paper instead of checking up on warrants looking out for reckless drivers or cruising around looking for suspicious activity. This is such a waste of tax payer money. And I think most ppl appreciate having signs up to inform them where they are going. I understand this if the signs are up for days, but the sign was up for literraly less then 3 minutes. If the sign is expired thats one thing but....Since the police have so much time on thier hands why dont we send them out to pick up litter off the side of the road, or deliver food to the elderly. Even dog poop patrol would be more useful then this.
Grace O'Malley wrote:As I was perusing Craigslist today searching for garage sales to attend, this caught my eye. The posting title was "Lakewood yardsale police." Here is the post:I wanted to inform people that if you have a sign up that says...free items....yard sale....lost pet it will be taken down. I put up 6 signs for a yard sale, and while my husband was putting them up he noticed a cop taking down the one he put up down the street, he followed the cop and saw him then take down a reward poster for a dog that was on a tree. I called Police Dept and was told, that it is lakewood city ordinance that you cant not have any signs posters up on telephone poles, tree lawns, the side of streets on trees, basically she said the only place you can place signs is in your own yard or a neghbors yard from whom you may get permission from.So basically this police officer spends his mornings everyday taking down harmless pieces of paper instead of checking up on warrants looking out for reckless drivers or cruising around looking for suspicious activity. This is such a waste of tax payer money. And I think most ppl appreciate having signs up to inform them where they are going. I understand this if the signs are up for days, but the sign was up for literraly less then 3 minutes. If the sign is expired thats one thing but....Since the police have so much time on thier hands why dont we send them out to pick up litter off the side of the road, or deliver food to the elderly. Even dog poop patrol would be more useful then this.
Thought it was interesting in light of this discussion.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:But lets make sure you understand, you and Shawn are the ones trying to marginalize the
discussion with the term "conspiracy."
Jim O'Bryan wrote:It is a major rebuild for a park that is about to get very
little use from the residents, but a ton of use from the patrons of Quaker Steak.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:The Draconian laws suggested by Kevin Butler were over the top wrong.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:* Chris the business district in the center of the city has received millions in subsidies, a
majority of which could have been used for residents. Perhaps you can name the program
that put even half of that amount of OUR money into OUR neighborhoods?
Christopher Bindel wrote:For the amount of respect you say you have for Director Butler you were railing against the whole proposal just the same with him as you were Juris. My point was the fact that you were being so close minded to anything but your own way until Anderson suggested he might not agree with you, then you discussed it reasonably giving constructive criticism of the proposed ordinance perhaps helping make it better and be more supportive to more residents. I liked your constructive arguments and thought they were offered well, I just thought it was too bad that you couldn't offer them earlier instead of coming in this thread so hostile.
Jim O'Bryan wrote:Christopher Bindel wrote:For the amount of respect you say you have for Director Butler you were railing against the whole proposal just the same with him as you were Juris. My point was the fact that you were being so close minded to anything but your own way until Anderson suggested he might not agree with you, then you discussed it reasonably giving constructive criticism of the proposed ordinance perhaps helping make it better and be more supportive to more residents. I liked your constructive arguments and thought they were offered well, I just thought it was too bad that you couldn't offer them earlier instead of coming in this thread so hostile.
***
Matt Markling is a friend who I respect, Ed Favre is a friend who I respect, I took both of them to task with inquiries into Grant School, School Spending, Superintendent searches Franklin School, dress codes, etc. I pushed hard for what I believed and they pushed back hard, but none of them as elected officials lowered the bar as Councilman Juris does every time he comes to the Deck to take me to task.