Page 5 of 5
Re: Obama on the debt limit
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:55 pm
by Stephen Eisel
More bad news for Obama
http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiswoodhi ... it-proved/Executives are judged by results. In terms of the economic results produced during the first 2.5 years of his first term, Obama is the worst president of the past 60 years. Given that Alter himself would likely agree that there have been some bad presidents during the past 60 years, this makes Obama a bad president.
but can Obama pull a Regan?
Re: Obama on the debt limit
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:36 pm
by Stephen Eisel
What would you do to fix the problem of the poor, Stephen?
I totally agree with the California State Senate. This does not fix the problem for every poor person but it will definitely help many people brake the cycle of poverty.
http://wireupdate.com/wires/19827/calif ... mmigrants/The California state senate has approved a bill which will give college students who are illegal immigrants access to public financial aid, the Los Angeles Times reported on Thursday.
Re: Obama on the debt limit
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:08 pm
by Stephen Eisel
There is a story floating around on the internet that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway owes $1 billion in back taxes.. What hypocrisy! if true
Re: Obama on the debt limit
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:38 pm
by Stephen Eisel
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/09 ... x-returns/The GOP is making a concerted effort to pressure billionaire investment guru Warren Buffett to release his tax returns to the public.
Republicans say Buffett — the public face of Obama’s proposed “Buffett rule” to increase taxes on the wealthy — needs to reveal his finances if his views on tax rates are going to serve as the basis for Obama administration policy.
“Will Warren Buffett release his tax returns so we can see why he should be the standard for tax policy?” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) questioned in a tweet Thursday
Re: Obama on the debt limit
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:31 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Thealexa Becker wrote: Yeah, that statistic you posted, Stephen, looks like it should be positive, but in actuality, it isn't. Perhaps you should do some research into what the Gini index is and what it means and some different economic interpretations of it. It might give you a better and fuller perspective on this issue rather than just a few random articles