Neighbors Celebrating Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity While Speaking Over The Digital Fence
https://deck.lakewoodobserver.com/
Again, it is not a tax but a fee.David Lay wrote:Stephen,
I pay rent to my landlord, who in turn pays property taxes on the property that I rent.
If I also had to pay a tax/fee/whatever, wouldn't that be double-dipping?
EDIT: According to the county auditor's website, my landlord paid 12,218.12 in property taxes last year for the building I live in.
LOL... This has nothing to do with property management.sharon kinsella wrote:Stephen - I don't fail to realize anything. I happen to be a little beyond the moron stage.
Talk to a property manager because obviously you seem to think you are the only one who knows what they're talking about.
It is a residency fee..David Lay wrote:Why should I have to pay a fee on a building that I don't own?
lolsharon kinsella wrote:Oh and Stephen -
Not the end of conversation. That would be the exchange of ideas not a sanctimonious diatribe.
No, I am saying that the city should look at charging a residency fee to renters. Note the word fee.. Thanks for paying attention again Dave..David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
You are not liable for property taxes as a renter. So how are you more liable for taxes then a home owner at $100'S annually?David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
Stephen, my rent pays for property taxes...so in effect I am liable, for the length of my lease.Stephen Eisel wrote:You are not liable for property taxes as a renter. So how are you more liable for taxes then a home owner at $100'S annually?David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
This would not impact property taxes.David Lay wrote:In a city that's known for high property taxes, that's the last thing we need.
Earlier in the thread you said a registration fee than renters would be liable for - now it's a residency feeStephen Eisel wrote:No, I am saying that the city should look at charging a residency fee to renters. Note the word fee.. Thanks for paying attention again Dave..David Lay wrote:So, you're saying that renters should be liable for more taxes/fees/whatever than home owners?
A lot of people, myself included, rent because we can't yet afford to own a home.
