Page 3 of 5

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:11 pm
by Stephen Eisel
sharon kinsella wrote:They have no answers just anger.


No they are determined not angry... The Democratic party ignored the voices of the people yesterday..

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:13 pm
by Bret Callentine
Grace O'Malley wrote:Remember that Roy is but a 30 year old.

Maybe when he has lived a bit more, had a family, and had some hardship, he will be able to understand.

His naivete is obvious.


Anyone else see the irony of this type of comment coming from the very same generation that used to say "Don't trust anyone over 50."?

Just curious, at what age is wisdom granted?

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:55 pm
by dl meckes
It was "Don't trust anyone over 30" and sometimes that's still good advice.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:03 pm
by Rhonda loje
I think that still may be true...
Which is really pathetic isn't it...

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:03 pm
by J Hrlec
Bret Callentine wrote:
Grace O'Malley wrote:Remember that Roy is but a 30 year old.

Maybe when he has lived a bit more, had a family, and had some hardship, he will be able to understand.

His naivete is obvious.


Anyone else see the irony of this type of comment coming from the very same generation that used to say "Don't trust anyone over 50."?

Just curious, at what age is wisdom granted?


I agree, that statement is extremely ridiculous... age plays no role in wisdom, wisdom only comes to those with the ability to grasp and collect it. Actually the whole comment shows a lack of it.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:41 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Bret Callentine wrote:
Grace O'Malley wrote:Remember that Roy is but a 30 year old.

Maybe when he has lived a bit more, had a family, and had some hardship, he will be able to understand.

His naivete is obvious.


Anyone else see the irony of this type of comment coming from the very same generation that used to say "Don't trust anyone over 50."?

Just curious, at what age is wisdom granted?

She sounds bitter to me...

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:11 am
by sharon kinsella
Stephen - What are the answers that you speak of, tell me, please.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 12:14 pm
by Stephen Eisel
sharon kinsella wrote:Stephen - What are the answers that you speak of, tell me, please.
Choices not mandates.. This bill is worst than the Patriot Act..


By David Hogberg
Sun., March 21, '10 3:24 PM ET

Of course, the overhaul is supposed to provide us with security. But it will result in skyrocketing insurance costs and physicians leaving the field in droves, making it harder to afford and find medical care. We may be about to live Benjamin Franklin’s adage, “People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.”

The sections described below are taken from HR 3590 as agreed to by the Senate and from the reconciliation bill as displayed by the Rules Committee.

1. You are young and don’t want health insurance? You are starting up a small business and need to minimize expenses, and one way to do that is to forego health insurance? Tough. You have to pay $750 annually for the “privilege.” (Section 1501)

2. You are young and healthy and want to pay for insurance that reflects that status? Tough. You’ll have to pay for premiums that cover not only you, but also the guy who smokes three packs a day, drink a gallon of whiskey and eats chicken fat off the floor. That’s because insurance companies will no longer be able to underwrite on the basis of a person’s health status. (Section 2701).

3. You would like to pay less in premiums by buying insurance with lifetime or annual limits on coverage? Tough. Health insurers will no longer be able to offer such policies, even if that is what customers prefer. (Section 2711).

4. Think you’d like a policy that is cheaper because it doesn’t cover preventive care or requires cost-sharing for such care? Tough. Health insurers will no longer be able to offer policies that do not cover preventive services or offer them with cost-sharing, even if that’s what the customer wants. (Section 2712).

5. You are an employer and you would like to offer coverage that doesn’t allow your employers’ slacker children to stay on the policy until age 26? Tough. (Section 2714).

6. You must buy a policy that covers ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services; chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care.

You’re a single guy without children? Tough, your policy must cover pediatric services. You’re a woman who can’t have children? Tough, your policy must cover maternity services. You’re a teetotaler? Tough, your policy must cover substance abuse treatment. (Add your own violation of personal freedom here.) (Section 1302).

7. Do you want a plan with lots of cost-sharing and low premiums? Well, the best you can do is a “Bronze plan,” which has benefits that provide benefits that are actuarially equivalent to 60% of the full actuarial value of the benefits provided under the plan. Anything lower than that, tough. (Section 1302 (d) (1) (A))

8. You are an employer in the small-group insurance market and you’d like to offer policies with deductibles higher than $2,000 for individuals and $4,000 for families? Tough. (Section 1302 (c) (2) (A).

9. If you are a large employer (defined as at least 101 employees) and you do not want to provide health insurance to your employee, then you will pay a $750 fine per employee (It could be $2,000 to $3,000 under the reconciliation changes). Think you know how to better spend that money? Tough. (Section 1513).

10. You are an employer who offers health flexible spending arrangements and your employees want to deduct more than $2,500 from their salaries for it? Sorry, can’t do that. (Section 9005 (i)).

11. If you are a physician and you don’t want the government looking over your shoulder? Tough. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to use your claims data to issue you reports that measure the resources you use, provide information on the quality of care you provide, and compare the resources you use to those used by other physicians. Of course, this will all be just for informational purposes. It’s not like the government will ever use it to intervene in your practice and patients’ care. Of course not. (Section 3003 (i))

12. If you are a physician and you want to own your own hospital, you must be an owner and have a “Medicare provider agreement” by Feb. 1, 2010. (Dec. 31, 2010 in the reconciliation changes.) If you didn’t have those by then, you are out of luck. (Section 6001 (i) (1) (A))
13. If you are a physician owner and you want to expand your hospital? Well, you can’t (Section 6001 (i) (1) (B). Unless, it is located in a country where, over the last five years, population growth has been 150% of what it has been in the state (Section 6601 (i) (3) ( E)). And then you cannot increase your capacity by more than 200% (Section 6001 (i) (3) (C)).

14. You are a health insurer and you want to raise premiums to meet costs? Well, if that increase is deemed “unreasonable” by the Secretary of Health and Human Services it will be subject to review and can be denied. (Section 1003)

15. The government will extract a fee of $2.3 billion annually from the pharmaceutical industry. If you are a pharmaceutical company what you will pay depends on the ratio of the number of brand-name drugs you sell to the total number of brand-name drugs sold in the U.S. So, if you sell 10% of the brand-name drugs in the U.S., what you pay will be 10% multiplied by $2.3 billion, or $230,000,000. (Under reconciliation, it starts at $2.55 billion, jumps to $3 billion in 2012, then to $3.5 billion in 2017 and $4.2 billion in 2018, before settling at $2.8 billion in 2019 (Section 1404)). Think you, as a pharmaceutical executive, know how to better use that money, say for research and development? Tough. (Section 9008 (b)).

16. The government will extract a fee of $2 billion annually from medical device makers. If you are a medical device maker what you will pay depends on your share of medical device sales in the U.S. So, if you sell 10% of the medical devices in the U.S., what you pay will be 10% multiplied by $2 billion, or $200,000,000. Think you, as a medical device maker, know how to better use that money, say for R&D? Tough. (Section 9009 (b)).

The reconciliation package turns that into a 2.9% excise tax for medical device makers. Think you, as a medical device maker, know how to better use that money, say for research and development? Tough. (Section 1405).

17. The government will extract a fee of $6.7 billion annually from insurance companies. If you are an insurer, what you will pay depends on your share of net premiums plus 200% of your administrative costs. So, if your net premiums and administrative costs are equal to 10% of the total, you will pay 10% of $6.7 billion, or $670,000,000. In the reconciliation bill, the fee will start at $8 billion in 2014, $11.3 billion in 2015, $1.9 billion in 2017, and $14.3 billion in 2018 (Section 1406).Think you, as an insurance executive, know how to better spend that money? Tough.(Section 9010 (b) (1) (A and B).)

18. If an insurance company board or its stockholders think the CEO is worth more than $500,000 in deferred compensation? Tough.(Section 9014).

19. You will have to pay an additional 0.5% payroll tax on any dollar you make over $250,000 if you file a joint return and $200,000 if you file an individual return. What? You think you know how to spend the money you earned better than the government? Tough. (Section 9015).

That amount will rise to a 3.8% tax if reconciliation passes. It will also apply to investment income, estates, and trusts. You think you know how to spend the money you earned better than the government? Like you need to ask. (Section 1402).

20. If you go for cosmetic surgery, you will pay an additional 5% tax on the cost of the procedure. Think you know how to spend that money you earned better than the government? Tough. (Section 9017).

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:59 am
by sharon kinsella
Here's one for you and the rest of your buddies, where have you been with all your great ideas, the last eight years. Where were you when the Patriot Act was put in place, when all the restrictions and regulations were removed from banks and the country was run into the worst recession/depression since the great depression.

Do something, shut up and do it.

I have worked hard to put people into place in the government who have vision that takes PEOPLE into account, not money or things but people.

Just do it. I hear a lot of talk from all of you, everyone of you. Like the old song says, a little less talk and a lot more action.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:56 am
by Stephen Eisel
Do something, shut up and do it.

I am... I am joining the Tea Party movement....

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:07 pm
by stephen davis
Stephen Eisel wrote:
Do something, shut up and do it.

I am... I am joining the Tea Party movement....


Then do so, proudly.



.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:32 pm
by Stephen Eisel
stephen davis wrote:
Stephen Eisel wrote:
Do something, shut up and do it.

I am... I am joining the Tea Party movement....


Then do so, proudly.



.


LOL.. You should find the longer version. It is much more telling. Have you ever seen the footage of the Democrats who were protesting against the Republican Party at the 2008 Convention? Based upon your logic, you should be proud to be a Democrat :D :D Next time, please bring a real argument.. Thanks!

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:59 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Remember Dale Robertson, "the racist nut" who the media paraded around as a symbol of the Tea Party movement. The guy with the racist sign.. Funny thing, the media never reported that Dale was a loner who had been rejected by every single Tea Party group that he associated with.

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:14 pm
by Ryan Salo


This is 1 of 3 pro healthcare protesters that came to an event outside Kucinich's office last week. She has some interesting answers to my questions. Also, she left with 2 people wearing ACORN shirts and got into her car with Illinois plates.

I think that she was correct when she said this would really help 31-32 people ;)

Re: Tea Partiers in front of Kucinich's Office

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:46 pm
by sharon kinsella
Ryan - She's a home health aide who works in my building. You weren't there when I went to yell with them. Did you also photograph the teapartiers who were blocking their sign. Did you photograph the two tea party guys who got into the Bentley with NY plates?