Stan Austin wrote:Tom Jordan's post on the Deck addressing that point made it very clear and explicit that the development of any plan would be open and in the public in front of the various boards and commissions responsible for those reviews.
And, finally, as quoted by the various media references, Mayor George made it very clear that his goal was that any final plan would have to result in a net increase to Lakewood of green space.
If any plan to sell the park would be open and public why was the memorandum of sale kept secret?
If the plan to sell the park would have resulted in a net increase to Lakewood green space why was the memorandum signed even though exhibit A of the memo contained drawings that showed NO green space.
And where in Lakewood can you find 10 acres of land for $2 million to replace the 10 acres that the City agreed to sell?
Matthew John Markling wrote:For example, if the county shows that Property A has a market value of $100,000 in 2007 and Property A sold for $200,000 in 2007, a complaint could be filed with the board of revision to increase the 2007 market value of Property A from $100,000 to $200,000.
Thanks for weighing in.
According to my precise calculations the next property tax bill for the Lakewood Plaza property should be $100,814.7567 due by July 31st 2008.
Of course, if the new owners succeed in having their propert tax bill reduced I would expect every homeowner in Lakewood to share in a similar percentage reduction in their property taxes.