Jennifer Pae wrote:....
The Initial Performance Measures have been refined and extended to provide useful management tools for all departments in Lakewood. All department managers now receive monthly reports for Payroll Analysis, Current Staffing, and Personnel & Operational Expenses to monitor their performance.
Furthermore, the tenets of CitiStat have fostered a culture of accountability for resolution. The follow-up processes, through memos and continual review of issues, have tracked particular problems and made their priorities clear.
Thanks for the information and the response.
Most of what you mentioned should be part of the normal management of any City. Shouldn't the people who work in the garage have noticed that the tire changing machine needed to be replaced without Citistat?
Do you really need a Citistat program to tell you that the toilet is leaking?
I am not sure why the City needs a whole new level of management but I guess that's the nature of government. Cost cutting tools and efforts at efficiency lead to more costs and less efficiency.
However, as Ed Favre pointed out, the administration does not view Citistat as a cost cutting tool. For a different view on the possibilities of Citistat see:
http://www.ci.baltimore.md.us/news/citi ... istat.html
I will be interested to see how the Citistat process deals with the hundreds of thousands of sick time hours used by City employees and the millions of dollars in overtime costs the City has paid over the last several years.
It would also be nice to see some study on the staffing levels. How many people worked for the City 2006? How many W-2's did the City generate? That is not a rhetorical question. I was going to send a special request but since you have joined in on the conversation everyone should see the answer.
By the way, I noticed that the City's new income tax department costs more than RITA. Is there an ongoing review of the decision to leave RITA?