Neighbors Celebrating Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity While Speaking Over The Digital Fence
https://deck.lakewoodobserver.com/
That she was motivated to think of me, in what may be her farewell, is quite moving. Pardon me while I reflect upon our good times.Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!
Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer.
But she made one last post!
I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress" (and Multi-Year Fraud).m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
cmager wrote:...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys.cmager wrote:cmager wrote:...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor for discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"m buckley wrote:Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?cmager wrote:cmager wrote:...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted, dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
Messrs. Buckley and Mager,cmager wrote:Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor of discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"m buckley wrote:Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?cmager wrote:cmager wrote:...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
Mr. Essi, we are quite civil, thank you! To my thinking, one does not want to torture it too much. One wants the same structure and cadence, and one wants to draw from the same word palette, so as to memorably link the presented message with the more true message.Brian Essi wrote:Messrs. Buckley and Mager, you are so gentlemanly.cmager wrote:Sure, that works as an alternate descriptor of discredited, conflicted, dark money "Lakewood Insiders Misleading Lakewood Voters"m buckley wrote:Mr. Mager, Thank you for the assist. I can't keep up with those guys. "Lakewood Insiders for Progress" is that right?cmager wrote:cmager wrote:...helpfully, you mean "Build Lakewood" rebranded by discredited, conflicted dark money Lakewood Insiders as "Lakewood Voters for Progress (and Multi-Year Fraud)"m buckley wrote:Bridget Conant wrote:It appears she may have removed herself from the board. You cannot click on her name any longer. But she made one last post!I doubt she was banned. I think it's more likely that she was benched by Build Lakewood. Having her in the rotation as we lead up to the election would have been a liability at best for Build Lakewood.Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
May I suggest the following descriptor "Fraud" from ordinary parlance be included in the rebrand of the rebrand. One common definition of "fraud" is a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities. I think it is accurate that LVFP "intends to deceive others by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments and qualities." i.e., its a fraud.
So how about: "Lakewood Insiders For Fraud"...and their "Forward" mantra be rebranded as "Fraud-ward"
My apologies, as has been noted, I am not very good at messaging.
Hey Deck/Observer,Patrick Wadden wrote:Maybe she was banned.
Bridget Conant wrote:No, we have her blindfolded and gagged in our secret back room where we talk about you.