Page 3 of 3
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:16 am
by Corey Rossen
Bill Call wrote:Corey Rossen wrote:
Seriously? If I have to explain it...
Or just keep on keepin' on. Either way.
How are you not disturbed by it?
Essi asks serious questions about serious issues. He is very aggressive in his questoning because the City is very agrees I've in his stonewalling.
It took me 6 months to get an appointment with Jack Gustin to get some answers about the management of the Hospital. When the meeting came he gave me the standard line about the solid future of Lakewood Hospital and the Vision for Tomorrow.
I later discovered that the decision had been made to transfer the Hospitals business to Fairview and Avon even before or meeting. Polite questions only get you so far. Sometimes they don't get you anywhere at all.
$160 million in City assets have been wasted away in exchange for nothing. Aren't you a little curious about how and why it happened?
Bill,
This thread is not about the hospital.
No hospital crossover as far as I am aware.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 10:57 am
by Ryan Salo
Brian Essi wrote:
I didn't.
I hate to get involved in this playground brawl but now I am curious as well. In that topic, Brian, you clearly reply to Kate as "Rick" 3 times. Once could be a mistake but 3 times? You had to mean something by saying that...
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:07 am
by Corey Rossen
Ryan Salo wrote:Brian Essi wrote:
I didn't.
I hate to get involved in this playground brawl but now I am curious as well. In that topic, Brian, you clearly reply to Kate as "Rick" 3 times. Once could be a mistake but 3 times? You had to mean something by saying that...
Ryan,
Unfortunately you will not get a response from Brian Essi. Nor will you ever get a response from him. He is like a bully who retreats to his dark victim status when called to answer--he hides. It is unfortunate, too, to have someone spew such venom yet cannot back up his own words. He avoids well and only throws bait in the water. He lacks his own substance he seeks so much.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:12 am
by Brian Essi
Ryan Salo wrote:Brian Essi wrote:
I didn't.
I hate to get involved in this playground brawl but now I am curious as well. In that topic, Brian, you clearly reply to Kate as "Rick" 3 times. Once could be a mistake but 3 times? You had to mean something by saying that...
Corey responded to cmager on behalf of Kate, does that mean he "called" himself Kate or pretended to be Kate?
Words matter.
The fact is I was addressing two men, not a woman.
Jay,
Your friends are trying to bump this thread down:
http://lakewoodobserver.com/forum/viewt ... =7&t=23037
Does this mean I called Ryan "Jay"?
Gentlemen,
Carry on with your efforts to protect the queen.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:22 am
by Ryan Salo
Brian,
I am hoping you are just playing games. Read the posts linked below. You were responding to Kate and called her Rick. There were no posts by someone named Rick. Are you saying Kate is not who she claims to be? Please dumb your answer down for my sake, be a communicator not an educator.
http://www.lakewoodobserver.com/forum/v ... 9&start=15
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:27 am
by Brian Essi
Ryan Salo wrote:Brian,
I am hoping you are just playing games. Read the posts linked below. You were responding to Kate and called her Rick. There were no posts by someone named Rick. Are you saying Kate is not who she claims to be? Please dumb your answer down for my sake, be a communicator not an educator.
http://www.lakewoodobserver.com/forum/v ... 9&start=15
I just replied to Jay and he made no posts.
https://youtu.be/S9cYq10OJ00?t=9s
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:30 am
by Corey Rossen
Brian Essi wrote:Ryan Salo wrote:Brian Essi wrote:
I didn't.
I hate to get involved in this playground brawl but now I am curious as well. In that topic, Brian, you clearly reply to Kate as "Rick" 3 times. Once could be a mistake but 3 times? You had to mean something by saying that...
Corey responded to cmager on behalf of Kate, does that mean he "called" himself Kate or pretended to be Kate?
Words matter.
The fact is I was addressing two men, not a woman.
Jay,
Your friends are trying to bump this thread down:
http://lakewoodobserver.com/forum/viewt ... =7&t=23037
Does this mean I called Ryan "Jay"?
Gentlemen,
Carry on with your efforts to protect the queen.
You are just digging yourself deeper.
I have never spoken for kate. She seems to speak very well for herself!
You were speaking directly to kate in your post. Then you even re-posted your words. You crack me up! Keep digging.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 11:32 am
by Ryan Salo
Wow, I think someone has hacked Brian's account. The guy I met was much more professional.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:03 pm
by kate e parker
this is who the zombies are hitching their wagon to.
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 7:56 am
by Tim Liston
What is a "Have" anyhow? Is there something inherently wrong with being a "Have?" I'm not sure I understand all the consternation....
Re: Haves & Have Nots – Brian Essi speaking for the Haves, “We are not the solution to your problems.”
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:35 am
by kate e parker
there really isn't any consternation. super-lawyer has repeatedly claimed to care for the underserved but as illustrated in this thread he really does not. I don't care about haves or have-nots. what I do care about is when people claim to take up a cause but are caught in hypocrisy. like caring for the underserved's medical needs but not for their sewer systems. you either care about the underserved or you do not. super simple.