Ignore the Troll

[Corey Rossen]

By the power vested in me by JOB, I decree the following solution to the Essi-Rossen "debate."

In the spirit of "Hamilton":
- Solstice Steps.
- Dawn.
- Spitballs.

The winner will be declared right in whatever the hell it is they are squabbling over. The loser picks up the spitballs.

I've already won. Corey just hasn't figured it out yet.

The only reason Dan received a response from Essi on this is due to the fact that there was not a single question mark in his post. Just one question mark in a post and Essi starts a new thread.

Now that Stan is awake, could somebody please point him in the direction of the parade.

[Brian Essi]

Which troll? Brian sure seems to egg people on and then demand a higher level response to his questions than he is willing to provide to others.

In regards to the other post "How many people actually look at the DECK?" I am thinking it will be less and less unique visitors the more cat fighting going on that invades every post.

Thank you Ryan.

So you would agree that one of my hypothesis has been proven:

If a poster like me pursues and acts like Corey, the poster will be perceived as a troll and it is "bad" for the Deck.

This also proves that Corey's longstanding behavior has the effect of being "bad" for the Deck.

One could also conclude that Corey's purpose in behaving badly is to cause damage to the Deck.

My posts in the past week prove that the more one engages with Corey, the more posts he makes--indeed he outpaced my posting.

Conversely, if you ignore Corey, he still invades nearly every post, adds no content and usually tries to change its subject claiming all the while claiming he has no agenda.

Also, it is interesting that there is a perception that I refused to answer questions---a perception created by Corey repeatedly asking the same questions about the mere filing of articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. In fact, I have answered all there is to know about that recent filing---more than Summers has about something he has been working on for several years. So a lie repeated over and over creates a false "reality"---nothing new there.

[Corey Rossen]

Which troll? Brian sure seems to egg people on and then demand a higher level response to his questions than he is willing to provide to others.

In regards to the other post "How many people actually look at the DECK?" I am thinking it will be less and less unique visitors the more cat fighting going on that invades every post.

Thank you Ryan.

So you would agree that one of my hypothesis has been proven:

If a poster like me pursues and acts like Corey, the poster will be perceived as a troll and it is "bad" for the Deck.

This also proves that Corey's longstanding behavior has the effect of being "bad" for the Deck.

One could also conclude that Corey's purpose in behaving badly is to cause damage to the Deck.

My posts in the past week prove that the more one engages with Corey, the more posts he makes--indeed he outpaced my posting.

Conversely, if you ignore Corey, he still invades nearly every post, adds no content and usually tries to change its subject claiming all the while claiming he has no agenda.

Also, it is interesting that there is a perception that I refused to answer questions---a perception created by Corey repeatedly asking the same questions about the mere filing of articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State. In fact, I have answered all there is to know about that recent filing---more than Summers has about something he has been working on for several years. So a lie repeated over and over creates a false "reality"---nothing new there.

So you admit to pursuing me. Thank you, I am flattered.