Page 14 of 20

Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:35 am
by Jim O'Bryan
David Lay wrote:Looks like AT&T is replacing exploding batteries:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120045143379793329.html

Maybe a bit late!


Image




.

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:11 am
by David Lay
Apparently one in Strongsville blew up:

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2008/01 ... boxes.html

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:40 am
by Jim O'Bryan
David Lay wrote:Apparently one in Strongsville blew up:

http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2008/01 ... boxes.html

David

This was the scary part, "believed to be the problem."

So something blows up in the box and it catches fire, and they "think" it might be the battery!

.

Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:22 pm
by David Lay
Consumerist picked it up:

http://tinyurl.com/yoyqq5

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:36 pm
by David Lay
Consumer Reports released their list of top ISPs today:

http://consumerist.com/347835/best-inte ... -providers

Cox ranked 3rd, AT&T 6th.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:44 pm
by Sharon O'Donnell
Fortunately for me, the box is at the other end of the street. As far as I can tell it is largely ornamental as we have yet to see the tiniest hint of actually getting the service. They told us it would be running by last fall. I suspect our box is a fake.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:51 pm
by stephen davis
Sharon O'Donnell wrote:As far as I can tell it is largely ornamental...
Sharon O'Donnell wrote:I suspect our box is a fake.

Now, THAT'S funny!


.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:32 pm
by Ryan Salo
Sharon,

Funny you should say that. I have one directly across the street from me and I don't have service available and they don't know when it will be. I wonder how many people are actually using this service for how many boxes they put out.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:08 pm
by Brian Pedaci
They just spent weeks installing a new VRAD at the site where I *KNOW* my service goes into (other times when they've been working on it I've had my service go out and had to ask the serviceman to reconnect my lines as I work from home).

Still no call, letter, email or door-to-door salesmen pitching the product. It's weird.

Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 9:13 pm
by David Lay
AT&T is claiming 231,000 U-Verse customers:

http://tinyurl.com/2rvpdh

Ahead at lightspeed

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:34 pm
by Bruce Kratofil
An AT&T salesguy came to the door tonight -- I told him I wouldn't do business with a company that thought so little of their customers that they would put those boxes on the tree lawn

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:03 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
Image

The other night while we were measuring the distance of every home in Rocky River, we ran across this massive, but very nice in antique brick LightSpeed/UVerse box in Rocky River.

It caused me to ponder how is AT&T keeping their promise with our delivering of high end product, with great maintenance and up keep of there installations that some have compared to loud humming mini-cities.

Does anyone at City Hall know where we are at on this?


.

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:14 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
Image

The other night while we were measuring the distance of every home in Rocky River, we ran across this massive, but very nice in antique brick LightSpeed/UVerse box in Rocky River.

It caused me to ponder how is AT&T keeping their promise with their delivering of the promised high end product, with great maintenance and up keep of there installations that some have compared to "loud humming, smoking, exploding mini-cities."

Does anyone at City Hall know where we are at on this?

Is there still a group that is trying to make city hall revisit this agreement and have AT&T place the boxes underground, or in people's backyards that are heavily compensated for the inconvenience?

Does the city know how many acres the nearly 300* "small humming cities smoking exploding cities" are occupying in this built out city? What is the rent that is being paid for those acres?

Image

My friend might be kidding, but sent this along with a note that said UVerse Phase Two installation in Malaysia. Mentioned the original plan was the size of a small refrigerator(beta), that grew to the size of a "small humming smoking exploding city"(phase 1) then overnight Phase Two!

Are we prepared for this?

* might only be a perception, not an actual number.


.

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:12 am
by stephen davis
When will they stop?

Image

Jim,

I hijacked this photo from your other thread. I wanted to continue the recorded history of these eyesores in THIS thread.

I wonder if all of these boxes were really in the original plan that was presented to City Council. Did anyone know what these things would look like? To me, they look like really old Soviet technology (Nikita Khrushchev's first transistor radio?). Are they serving the community in ANY way?

All of the cement pads that support these boxes look big enough to support expansion. Is there anything that keeps AT&T from parking the equivalent of a double-wide full of wires in Lakewood Park?

This would be a good story for someone to write from a two-years-later perspective. It would require some conversation with Council members, the Law Department, and maybe even AT&T, to see where we've been, and where we are going with this ugly stuff that promises high technology.

Steve


.

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:57 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
stephen davis wrote:When will they stop?

Image

All of the cement pads that support these boxes look big enough to support expansion. Is there anything that keeps AT&T from parking the equivalent of a double-wide full of wires in Lakewood Park?
.

psssssssssssssssssssst

Image

what do you think is in here?

Speaking of space, what are PODS paying us for this billboard in our public park?


.