Meg Ostrowski wrote:Matt,
Thanks for posting Dr. Madak's summary.
It seems the primary reason we are holding on to some of the vacant properties is so that we can handle the disruption that will take place at the high school.
If I understand correctly, each year Lakewood falls further back in line for OSFC funding based on Ohio Department of Education calculations of the district's three year average "adjusted valuation per pupil," and the percentage of funding decreases.
As we wait "for our number to come up" with OSFC, I would like to see the board take action to split the completion of the high school from the elementary school projects so that we can move forward. I was told during Phase III by Treasurer, Rick Berdine that this could not be done because some of the funds needed would have to come from OSFC. Now that the numbers (enrollment and funding) have changed, this may no longer hold up or justify delaying the high school renovation.
With all of the issues surrounding the elementary school projects, there seems a much greater chance of passing a bond issue that is exclusively tied to the completion of the high school.
Meg
Meg,
I'm with you. There is all of this debate surrounding our elementary schools-- our enrollment numbers, uses of schools that were overbuilt that must house programs like ABLE, keeping schools that are in neighborhoods that don't have a lot of families and cost 12 million dollars more to renovate etc.
All of the kids in Lakewood that are going to public school are headed to Lakewood High School. Everyone wants our high school finished.
A bond issue for that would probably pass, withOUT the Ohio School Facilities Commission's funds. I think it would be good for the mental health of all of the citizens of Lakewood if instead of having Lakewood High held hostage to "our number coming up" on the OSFC's long list, we took care of it ourselves.
Betsy Voinovich