Jim DeVito wrote:I wonder how much of out office space is ready for the new technology enabled business we will need in the future. While I agree it is a waste of time to wait for anybody else to solve our problems, I would welcome help to improve our infrastructure.
Interesting thought. Is the type of technological improvement you are talking about infrastruture? I think it is. Which opens up some interesting possibilities.
Bryan Schwegler wrote:Bill, you keep saying you think we can do better, but you haven't given any examples as to how? I'm curious what you think should or could be done differently?
As a start:
City council needs an governmental affairs committe to fight the fight against State government; it's unfunded mandates, collective bargaining laws and its polcies. That committee could also represent the City's interest during "regionalization" discussions.
Building and housing should be part of the Division of Planning & Development. The building department has a responsibiity to enforce building codes but that doesn't mean it should be the enemy of business or business development. The builidng department should be the place to go to find solutions.
Salaries and benefits of the Division of Planning & development are projected to be 50% of the budget. That seems high.
Does the City need its own welfare department?
Back in the early 60's when the City had 20,000 more people City hall was half as large. Is there a lesson there?