Page 2 of 3
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:17 pm
by sharon kinsella
I don't know but I think we should use them as an example and we do need to be exploring and cultivating renewable resources. So many things we could do, jobs we could create, right here in NE Ohio.
I keep telling people to look a what Majora Carter has done, in the Bronx on TED.com. We could do that. If I was younger I would be working on getting her project here everyday.
Tons of other great thinkers on there also. We could do so much.
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:55 pm
by Stephen Eisel
sharon kinsella wrote:During the Bush administration there was systematic downsizing of budgets, personnel, salaries and enforcement capabilities of all enforcement agencies.
Look at the coal mine disasters and the lack of safety enforcements.
When you strip budgets of these agencies and take away their ability to enforce or propose good regulatory practices, you wind up with what we now have. A disaster of epic proportions.
Those of you who rant about making government smaller, pay close attention to what has and has not gone on with these agencies. Do you really want smaller and even less efficient government. Shall we let corporate American police itself.
Take a little trip down to New Orleans, see what it really means.
LOL.. so much for hope and change.. You mean after 500 days in office and over a Trillion dollars in spending that Obama was not smart enought to fix this Bush mistake?
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:09 pm
by Roy Pitchford
sharon kinsella wrote:When you strip budgets of these agencies and take away their ability to enforce or propose good regulatory practices, you wind up with what we now have. A disaster of epic proportions.
Those of you who rant about making government smaller, pay close attention to what has and has not gone on with these agencies. Do you really want smaller and even less efficient government. Shall we let corporate American police itself.
1. A government exemption is different from
"We've haven't got the funding to perform all the checks that are necessary."2. Yes, I do "rant" about making government smaller...but regulation regarding public safety is one of those grey areas for me where I lean
towards government regulation.
However, let me also point out that its government regulation gave us deep-water drilling in the first place. If this rig had been in 500 feet of water, much closer to shore, it would likely have been fixed by now. It was environmental regulation and a "no-ugly-rigs-to-spoil-my-view" mentality (similar to that of the Kennedy family and the Nantucket wind turbines) which forced the rigs into deeper water.
Note: Public safety, NOT tree hugging.
sharon kinsella wrote:My mirror says one tank 3 months. You?
Aren't you retired? I don't know what Mr. Coleman's age is, but if you're retired and he works a full-time job, you're comparing apples and oranges.
Personally, let me check. (I've tracked my gas usage for the past 6+ years.)
11/29/03 - 3/14/04 (3.5)
03/18/05 - 06/01/05 (2/5)
06/03/08 - 10/16/08 (4.5)
6/21/2009 - 9/3/2009 - 11/1/2009 (2.25 and 2)
5/8/10 - ??? (2 months and counting)
This is with a 5-day per week job. I do it with a handy little electric scooter which, on nice days, I can ride anywhere in Lakewood.
I pity the next generation, the grandkid's growing up knowing that they weren't treasured by those who came before.

I agree.
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:20 pm
by sharon kinsella
Dear, dear Roy. I'm retired, not dead. There are many demands, medical and community-based, local and LGBT, on my time. I make choices, I do things methodically, always have.
When I worked I almost always took public transportation, always made sense to me. I very rarely set out to do errands on my own, I usually take other with me so we can team up to get things done.
Stephen, you goof, don't you think he needs more time to clean up the mess your boy left for him? He's been a little busy dear, why don't you offer your services?
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:06 pm
by Jim DeVito
Whats that kids number? If he is paying mortgages he is more than welcome to pay mine.
Also Roy, Are you sure the super risky deep water drilling was not due to the face that we are running out of oil on land and in shallow water?
And who says government regulation does not work. We may suck at it here but Norway seems to do it just fine.
http://www.oilandgasforum.net/managemen ... ayprof.htmI can not recall numbers but they have been drilling for a while and have had only a few spills and non of it ever made it to shore.
Let's face it we are never going to stop driving cars. We have built the car into every aspect of our lives. Bickering about how much oil one uses is almost irreverent in this day and age. As humans we all use a crap load of it. This spill (and lets not forgot people lost their lives) and coal mine disasters will keeping happing. That is just the world we chose to build for ourselves.
If you really want to hurt Big Oil, then build a rig in lake erie and spill oil all over the coast. Sad to say but we are going to need more oil on more beaches before we warm up to the face that the good old days are over.
Thread Moved.
btw = Nuclear Power + Electric Cars = Win.
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:40 am
by Roy Pitchford
Jim DeVito wrote:Also Roy, Are you sure the super risky deep water drilling was not due to the face that we are running out of oil on land and in shallow water?
http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/The_U.S._s_Untapped_Bounty_080630.htmlThe U.S. is sitting on the world's largest, untapped oil reserves -- reservoirs which energy experts know exist, but which have not yet been tapped and may not be attainable with current technology. In fact, such untapped reserves are estimated at about 2.3 trillion barrels, nearly three times more than the reserves held by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) nations and sufficient to meet 300 years of demand -- at today's levels -- for auto, truck, aircraft, heating and industrial fuel, without importing a single barrel of oil.
Oil shales: Oil extracted from shale fields represents the mother lode of untapped reserves, at about 1.5 trillion barrels -- or 200 years worth of supply at current usage levels. Roughly two-thirds of the U.S.'s oil shale fields in Colorado, Wyoming and Utah are in federally-protected areas and closed to development. In addition, getting the oil out of the rock is a challenge, requiring cooking or chemical treatment of rock located as much as half a mile under the earth's surface.
To make oil shale production economically worthwhile, crude oil prices must remain above $50 a barrel for a protracted period. Given the outlook for continued high prices, oil companies such as ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell Inc., EGL Resources, Brazil's Petrobras and others are gearing up pilot projects on nonfederal lands. The potential is to produce 1 million barrels of oil a day within a decade from lands currently open -- and several times that amount if the lawmakers give the green light to development of lands now off-limits.
Tar sands: Around 75 billion barrels of oil could come from tar sands, similar to Canadian fields, which now churn out a million barrels a day. The sands are located predominantly in Utah, Alaska, Texas and California, as well as in Alabama and Kentucky on federal and state lands that, by laws and administrative orders, are closed to mineral and petroleum development.
The outer continental shelf (OCS): Something in the neighborhood of 90 billion barrels of oil sit beneath the ocean bed 50 to 100 miles off the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf coasts. Presidential bans and congressional prohibitions have put the tracts off-limits to oil company exploration at least until 2012, although there's a chance that Congress may lift the moratorium before then. In recent months, several key policymakers, including GOP presidential candidate John McCain and Florida Governor Charles Crist Jr. (R), have reversed their positions on drilling in the OCS. Crist's change of mind may signal a new trend. Concern about potential damage to his state's beaches and Florida's critical tourism industry had dictated his opposition to drilling off the state's coasts. But the state's growing budget woes -- and the prospect of capturing some cash from off-shore leasing -- is proving alluring.
The Bakken Play: With up to 100 billion barrels of oil, the reserves locked under rocks buried a mile or more beneath Montana and Saskatchewan, Canada, are more than twice the size of Alaskan's entire oil cache. New drilling and oil recovery technologies are overcoming production obstacles and petroleum companies are rushing to stake their claims. Marathon Oil recently acquired about 200,000 acres in the area and will drill about 300 oil wells within five years. Brigham Exploration and Crescent Point Energy Trust also want a piece of the action. EOG Resources alone figures it can produce 80 million barrels of oil from its Bakken field. But It will take at least five years before the oil starts flowing in large volumes.
The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge: About 10 billion barrels of oil are locked away here, with little possibility that federal lawmakers will open the door.
Let me ask everyone something: Do you support the moratorium Obama's placed on deep-water drilling?
How do you feel about the US sending $2 billion of our taxes as a loan to Brazil's Petrobras for their own deep-water drilling?
So, its bad if we do it, but perfectly fine if Brazil does?
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 11:51 am
by Jim DeVito
To the first point. I don't buy it. So that report says that 300 years of energy independence is just sitting there waiting to be taped? Just waiting for Palin to come and drill it all out? The government is so full of scumbags it would have been done already.
Anyway, Yes I so support the moratorium. Not because I am a leftist nut. But because it is the logical thing to do. Because the point of history is to learn from it. We screwed it up. That blow out thing blew up for a reason. I'm sure it was a preventable reason. Do we not owe it to the 11 people who lost their lives, and all the people who are out on the rigs now just one blow out from losing theirs, to at lease pause for a second and see what the hell went wrong. Maybe not in this America where the company bottom line comes above all else.
Here is the other thing. Who cares about the environment? Regardless of your stance on warming or birds or dolphins, you should care about doing everything possible to advance domestic innovation into advanced energy. Let face it China and the Europeans are years ahead of us on advanced energy. Under the shadow of global warming and national security they have been able to make grate strides to position themselves as the tech and industrial leaders of the new energy market. We will become net importers of advanced energy tech. And as such we will fail.
That kid needs to worry less about paying my morgatg and more about how his kids kids will fight the oil and water wars of the future.
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 8:00 am
by sharon kinsella
Renewable resources make economic sense. Once the initial costs are paid the energy we will get will serve generations. Yes I understand upkeep etc. But it is so much cheaper and safer in the long run.
They technological sense. It's new day, not the dawn of the industrial era. We know better now, it's time to act better.
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 9:22 am
by Roy Pitchford
Jim DeVito wrote:To the first point. I don't buy it. So that report says that 300 years of energy independence is just sitting there waiting to be taped? Just waiting for Palin to come and drill it all out? The government is so full of scumbags it would have been done already.
The government is full of scumbags who are interested in gaining and keeping power. If those lands were opened up for drilling and processing, there's no need for cap-and-trade. Cap-and-trade is a power play. They think they know better than us and they're going to try to prove it. We are too stupid to properly control our electricity systems, so we're getting a smart grid.
We won't give up our SUVs, so they are going to price us out of gas.
Jim DeVito wrote:Anyway, Yes I so support the moratorium. Not because I am a leftist nut. But because it is the logical thing to do.
How is it logical for us to then turn around and give $2 billion to Petrobras to do the same thing we aren't allowed to do?
Jim DeVito wrote:Here is the other thing. Who cares about the environment? Regardless of your stance on warming or birds or dolphins, you should care about doing everything possible to advance domestic innovation into advanced energy. Let face it China and the Europeans are years ahead of us on advanced energy. Under the shadow of global warming and national security they have been able to make grate strides to position themselves as the tech and industrial leaders of the new energy market. We will become net importers of advanced energy tech. And as such we will fail.
Where's the infrastructure to support the new technologies?
For example, want a Nissan Leaf? That's great! Where do you plan to recharge it? It doesn't just plug in to any wall outlet.
I agree with you, but until we've developed advanced technologies and built up the infrastructure, what are we going to do?
sharon kinsella wrote:Renewable resources make economic sense. Once the initial costs are paid the energy we will get will serve generations. Yes I understand upkeep etc. But it is so much cheaper and safer in the long run.
That's what the farmers in Wisconsin thought when they allowed power companies to put up dozens of wind turbines on their land. Guess what? They're still paying for it.
I should also ditto my previous comment about new technologies. Solar, wind, hydro-electric, etc. all generate electricity. Until there's electrical charging stations every 40-60 miles all across the country and one really huge step forward with battery technology, its not going to be practical for transportation. Who's got the money to build that infrastructure?
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 1:13 pm
by Stephen Eisel
Stephen, you goof, don't you think he needs more time to clean up the mess your boy left for him? He's been a little busy dear, why don't you offer your services?
Busy doing what? The economy is still tanking... Iraq and Afghanistan are still being run by left over Bush appointees.. Playing golf while the largest man made eco-disaster rages on.... He has made the mess a lot bigger... I now regret not campaigning for Hillary... This is what happens when we elect unqualified candidates to office.. Hope and change... How is that working for you?

Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:52 pm
by Jim DeVito
Not to get all existential here... But is anybody really ever qualified to be the leader of the "free" world?
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:32 pm
by sharon kinsella
Sweetie he's already done many of the things I wanted him to do.
How'd your boy do? Maybe we could tape Palin, Bachman, Boehner and Cheney together and get a person you'd all love.
"That Putin, what's he thinking?"
Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:01 am
by Stephen Eisel
sharon kinsella wrote:Sweetie he's already done many of the things I wanted him to do.
How'd your boy do? Maybe we could tape Palin, Bachman, Boehner and Cheney together and get a person you'd all love.
"That Putin, what's he thinking?"
At least Sarah knows how to clean up an oil spill... just sayin..

Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:26 am
by Jim DeVito
So I get the joke (good one btw) but how would mccain and palin clean up the spill any better? The good news is that due to our crazy news cycle nobody will care in a couple of weeks.

Re: BP Customers - WHY?
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:19 pm
by Roy Pitchford
First off, regarding the original intent of this thread. There was a big article, front page, of the Plain Dealer today.
Popular Anger at BP may be misdirected at local gas stations
Independent operators see boycott driving them, not the big petroleum company, out of business
Take from that what you will.
Jim DeVito wrote:So I get the joke (good one btw) but how would mccain and palin clean up the spill any better? The good news is that due to our crazy news cycle nobody will care in a couple of weeks.

Are you asking specifically about them or how, in general, someone could have done better?