Meg Ostrowski wrote:cameron karslake wrote:
Ahh, the good ole days of community hospitals. It seems the trend is reversing! (IF it was a trend in the first place)
Metro would have been a great partner for Lakewood to have in the medical industry. They (Metro) are obviously adjusting to patient's needs with compassion, as opposed to the Clinic who is more interested in chasing the almighty $.
This news stings.
http://www.cleveland.com/healthfit/inde ... rt_m-rpt-1
Some say "timing is everything." Lakewood leaders ignored Metro's interest and missed out on an opportunity to keep jobs and life saving services close to home.
Meg
The Lakewood deal had ZERO to do with healthcare or jobs. ZERO. It was all about grabbing the money and land for a couple people to develop. The biggest piece missing from the Metro Deal was letting them keep land and money. Virtually every other part of the deal was much better.
Bridget Conant wrote:
From day one, this was a Cleveland Clinic deal that the mayor and his administration rubber stamped. No other alternatives were ever envisioned; in fact, they were blocked.
Why do you think the city is fighting so hard to keep records of meetings and emails hidden?
Bridget
From day one the Clinic was a red herring. Again, and you know this the entire deal was about a small group of friends of the mayor, acquiring the foundation money for development or to manage as they see fit, and the ability to develop, something, anything. They lost on 3 other chances and were willing to do anything including gamble the entire future of Lakewood for one last shot, one last chance to develop something, no, make that anything in their lifetime.
The emails were hidden for a variety of reasons. All of them bad.
.