The Observation Deck

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

cmager wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:
Name one person who wants to buy your house (without putting it on the market or listing it) besides Stan?

Go ahead, just sell it to Stan, nobody else wants it.

Maybe I am reading into your response wrong, but it sounds like you agree with me.

Nobody else stepped up to want the house. If I wait, nobody will still want it, but then it would be worth zero.

I'm guessing if we agree, I am reading into your response wrong.

You're wrong--nobody was asked--no marketing or listing.

Name the names of who wants your house. Go!

No one wants my house but Stan. People have stepped up to the plate but have backed down and gone away.
In the end, the only one who is willing to pay for my house is Stan.

If Stan is the only person who wants my house, why would I turn him down knowing that:
No one stepped up and wanted my house now except Stan, even less will want it in the future.
My house needs work now, and will need substantially more in the years to come.
The value of my house now is what it is now, and knowing it will depreciate to zero in the near future, I stand to gain more now.
Knowing all of this, it is in my best interest to know that I am making the best deal for my house, and it looks even better considering what the future holds for the depreciation down to zero.

If I do not sell my house now knowing all of this above, what is my plan to gain in the future? What are the assured tangibles? Go!

I'll buy the house for $8999, with the following conditions: it comes with all the contents, I take possession of it tomorrow, it comes with a demolition permit, and you can entertain no other offers.

Did you really think this through, or just want to jump in? As a general rule of thumb, offers do not come in late, underbid, overdemand and expect to be taken seriously. Next.

With your scenario, I already have a better offer from Stan, though yours is the only other offer ever made. So I am taking Stan's over yours.

But wait, the Lakewood Health and Wellness Foundation, Inc., (Metro) a charity that is better at helping the poor than your friend Stan (CCF), hereby offers to invest over ten times what Stan has offered, we'll build a new kitchen, new baths, new garage and install a state of the art jacuzzi, and you can live there for life enjoying all of this with the beneficiaries of JFF included. If you don't like that offer, just tell me what you do want because I really want to help you and the children JFF helps (Metro's offer).

Oh, you say you don't want "people like LHWF" (Metro) in your neighborhood and you sent Stan and his political allies to tell me to back off its his turf?

Okay, I'll go away, but what will you say to the JFF children?

Oh, I see you say "We're Gonna be Great Again" "You're Gonna Make It All Great"

Just tell me how to vote, I am confused.

Metro offer never made it to the table because they backed away. Nobody else has even approached the table.

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:
Name one person who wants to buy your house (without putting it on the market or listing it) besides Stan?

Go ahead, just sell it to Stan, nobody else wants it.

Maybe I am reading into your response wrong, but it sounds like you agree with me.

Nobody else stepped up to want the house. If I wait, nobody will still want it, but then it would be worth zero.

I'm guessing if we agree, I am reading into your response wrong.

You're wrong--nobody was asked--no marketing or listing.

Name the names of who wants your house. Go!

No one wants my house but Stan. People have stepped up to the plate but have backed down and gone away.

In the end, the only one who is willing to pay for my house is Stan.

If Stan is the only person who wants my house, why would I turn him down knowing that:
No one stepped up and wanted my house now except Stan, even less will want it in the future.
My house needs work now, and will need substantially more in the years to come.
The value of my house now is what it is now, and knowing it will depreciate to zero in the near future, I stand to gain more now.
Knowing all of this, it is in my best interest to know that I am making the best deal for my house, and it looks even better considering what the future holds for the depreciation down to zero.

If I do not sell my house now knowing all of this above, what is my plan to gain in the future? What are the assured tangibles? Go!

Brian Essi wrote:Names. Go!

Corey Rossen wrote:Future tangibles. Go!

Gary Rice wrote:Future tangibles?

Keeping this fantasy hypothetical alive for a moment...

Actually, to keep this conversation somewhat analogous, I would think that Corey would still be keeping the bricks and mortar. Stan would only have bought the name "Corey's House" and assets thereof, and then moved them all away. Corey would still own the bricks and mortar, taxes, liabilities and property upkeep. For that matter, I suppose Corey could still call the property "his" house... ...but a home, it would no longer be... The real question in my mind would be whether Corey owned the house clear or was it also titled to his extended family? If that were the case, could Stan actually buy the house without getting permission from the extended family who also owned the property? Just thinkin' hypothetical here of course... In the real world, I'm sure that Corey would NEVER sell his property without making sure he had a clear title and permission to do so.

Back to the banjo...

Brian Essi wrote:Names. Go!

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:Names. Go!

More silence, I was right...again, Mr. Essi.

Jim O'Bryan wrote:

Corey Rossen wrote:

Brian Essi wrote:Names. Go!

More silence, I was right...again, Mr. Essi.

Corey,

The site did activate where you can block people's posts you do not want to read.

Just saying.

.