Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

The jumping off discussion area for the rest of the Deck. All things Lakewood.
Please check out our other sections. As we refile many discussions from the past into
their proper sections please check them out and offer suggestions.

Moderator: Jim O'Bryan

Bridget Conant
Posts: 2896
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:22 pm

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by Bridget Conant »

They say if you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bulls**t.

She does a good job of illustrating that.
m buckley
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:52 pm

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by m buckley »

Dan Alaimo wrote:I don't think anyone with any kind of interest in the hospital deal has been able to work full-time at their regular jobs since sometime last year. When Council put off the referendum vote from March to November, that just prolonged the distraction and fostered more bad blood within the city. It caused a rift in our civic soul that will take a long time to heal. I don't think that gave the City any advantage in defeating the referendum that they didn't already have earlier this year.

That postponement was pure evil.

We need to vote "against" in the referendum if nothing else to send a message to the entrenched players that the old way of doing business is no longer acceptable to us.

Mr. Alaimo has hit it right on the head.
Sam O'Leary and the rest of the political opportunists that comprise City Council made a very cynical calculation when they pushed back the referendum vote from March to November. In concert with Mr. Summers and his "win at all cost" paradigm of governance, they chose to string the process out in the hopes of improving their chances. They thought only of themselves. They were willing to let Lakewood twist in the wind. They were willing to accept, as part of the price of politics in Lakewood, an intensification of the rancor and divisiveness that now plagues us.
To borrow from Mr. Alaimo, their actions "caused a rift in our civic soul that will take a long time to heal. The postponement was pure evil."
" City Council is a 7-member communications army." Colin McEwen December 10, 2015.
Brian Essi
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu May 07, 2015 11:46 am

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by Brian Essi »

m buckley wrote:
Dan Alaimo wrote:I don't think anyone with any kind of interest in the hospital deal has been able to work full-time at their regular jobs since sometime last year. When Council put off the referendum vote from March to November, that just prolonged the distraction and fostered more bad blood within the city. It caused a rift in our civic soul that will take a long time to heal. I don't think that gave the City any advantage in defeating the referendum that they didn't already have earlier this year.

That postponement was pure evil.

We need to vote "against" in the referendum if nothing else to send a message to the entrenched players that the old way of doing business is no longer acceptable to us.

Mr. Alaimo has hit it right on the head.
Sam O'Leary and the rest of the political opportunists that comprise City Council made a very cynical calculation when they pushed back the referendum vote from March to November. In concert with Mr. Summers and his "win at all cost" paradigm of governance, they chose to string the process out in the hopes of improving their chances. They thought only of themselves. They were willing to let Lakewood twist in the wind. They were willing to accept, as part of the price of politics in Lakewood, an intensification of the rancor and divisiveness that now plagues us.
To borrow from Mr. Alaimo, their actions "caused a rift in our civic soul that will take a long time to heal. The postponement was pure evil."
Messrs. Alaimo and Buckley,

I agree.

The Lakewood insiders are a dumpster of deplorables.
David Anderson has no legitimate answers
cameron karslake
Posts: 646
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:35 am

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by cameron karslake »

Citizen Brian Essi wrote:

"I agree.

The Lakewood insiders are a dumpster of deplorables."


Nice Brian...ouch!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
cmager
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 8:33 am

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by cmager »

Brian Essi wrote:The Lakewood insiders are a dumpster of deplorables.
Awesome. For branding purposes, I prefer the more formal "Dumpster of Deplorables"
m buckley
Posts: 708
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 12:52 pm

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by m buckley »

Brian Essi wrote: The Lakewood insiders are a dumpster of deplorables.
Mr. Essi, That's a walk-off description.

In accord with Mr. Mager and strictly for branding purposes, might I also suggest the more formal "Dumpster of Deplorables."

Just a thought.
" City Council is a 7-member communications army." Colin McEwen December 10, 2015.
Stan Austin
Contributor
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Does Lakewood Really Need a Full Time Finance Director?

Post by Stan Austin »

Back to the original question of the need for a full time Finance Director--- The position apparently requires competence in check writing and maintaining a ledger. It would seem that the current holder of the position has strayed into areas for which there are no demonstrated competencies.
Stan Austin
Post Reply