Re: Observer Project hides from illegal account access, simple questions and other allegations
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 5:30 pm
It's clear that he has other things on his mind besides you, Corey.
Neighbors Celebrating Free Speech and Intellectual Diversity While Speaking Over The Digital Fence
https://deck.lakewoodobserver.com/
This is just the post Jim was caught on.Missy Limkemann wrote:Because if someone is going to hack an account...they are not going to just post one "quote" post. Seriously...if i hack an account i am going to town. I am posting all over the place, i am saying everything under the sun. I am not just doing 1 post and leaving.Corey Rossen wrote:You crack me up. Hilarious post.Missy Limkemann wrote:where is the wall so i can bang my head against it? repeatedly? NO ONE HACKED YOUR ACCOUNT!!!
I wish my ego was that big to think someone hacked me!!!! (omg...and i am the nice one...the always nice one...what happened to me? I never say anything bad...ever.... ok I'm going back to my corner to play with special needs dogs)
Why do you feel Jim can do no wrong?
Have you ever been hacked? I have. It took me months to straighten it all out... MONTHS.
This whole "issue" is dividing a city. Dividing friends. Reminds me of the pitbull fight (and you know how i feel about that). This is sad. I used to love this city, now I can't wait to move.
I don't understand your willingness to give such a free pass for an invasion of privacy. I guess if the City of Lakewood went through your online accounts you would not have a problem with it. What if someone else had access to your accounts, would that be okay?Bridget Conant wrote:WTF is in "your account?"
You act like someone stole your family's jewels.
Aren't you part of the same group that has a problem with someone at City Hall having access to people's privacy? The hypocracy is amazing in the Safe Dome.cmager wrote:Specious
Sorry, I must have missed all of your insightful contributions.cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen, why is it that your engagement on The Deck is *always* one where you attack the messenger, or attack the Deck, or blow up threads, or say the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I", etc. Even the exhibits of the SLAPP lawsuit show your active involvement in hampering that dialogue. Nary a word of issue-oriented content, of substance, or of seeking truth and justice. That's what makes you different on The Deck. You're either reaching, or have reached, a "whatever" point.
That there is an "I know you are but what am I" reply. Check / duly noted.Corey Rossen wrote:Sorry, I must have missed all of your insightful contributions.cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen, why is it that your engagement on The Deck is *always* one where you attack the messenger, or attack the Deck, or blow up threads, or say the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I", etc. Even the exhibits of the SLAPP lawsuit show your active involvement in hampering that dialogue. Nary a word of issue-oriented content, of substance, or of seeking truth and justice. That's what makes you different on The Deck. You're either reaching, or have reached, a "whatever" point.
C'mon admit it, you'd miss me if I wasn't here.cmager wrote:That there is an "I know you are but what am I" reply. Check / duly noted.Corey Rossen wrote:Sorry, I must have missed all of your insightful contributions.cmager wrote:Mr. Rossen, why is it that your engagement on The Deck is *always* one where you attack the messenger, or attack the Deck, or blow up threads, or say the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I", etc. Even the exhibits of the SLAPP lawsuit show your active involvement in hampering that dialogue. Nary a word of issue-oriented content, of substance, or of seeking truth and justice. That's what makes you different on The Deck. You're either reaching, or have reached, a "whatever" point.