Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:14 am
by David Scott
So besides looking good in a suit, did he say anything of substance besides 'hope' and 'change' ?
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:43 am
by David Anderson
David -
Visit
http://www.barackobama.com/index.php to learn about his positions and policy initiatives.
Just because Senator Obama doesn't gather thousands into a center to go over how the Office of Management and Budget "scores" legislation or offers flip charts as to how the Workforce Investment Act is missing its intended mark doesn't mean he doesn't have positions.
Don't believe in the hogwash being offered by the Clinton machine to try to "define" the opponent. Each of the remaining Dem and Rep candidates has made their positions on dozens of issues readily available in debates and online. However, Ralph Nader is another story altogether.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:55 am
by Bret Callentine
nice job.
I can't wait to see the photos you get from this mornings town meeting with John McCain.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:55 am
by Jim O'Bryan
David Scott wrote:So besides looking good in a suit, did he say anything of substance besides 'hope' and 'change' ?
David
As I was working, really did not hear much.
The one thing I heard that bothered me was, "The war will cost over 1 Trillion Dollars. that money could have been better used..."
Well that money is borrowed money.
It could have best been used not borrowing it!
As D. Anderson points out, his message and his platform is on his website. His message is not that different from Hillary. I prefer to make the louder statement with Obama. Also his attitude seems much more laid back. It reminded me of the days Andrew Young was our Ambassador to the UN.
.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:08 am
by Ivor Karabatkovic
same here, I was working as well. Capturing the detail
.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:21 am
by Gary Rice
Does Mr. Obama really NEED to say anything except "hope" and "change"?
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:58 am
by Jim O'Bryan
Gary Rice wrote:Does Mr. Obama really NEED to say anything except "hope" and "change"?
In this day and age I think you can get elected to anything saying "Change."
This was more of a "rally" so that most there were not looking for depth, as much as inspiration. The man is inspirational to say the least.
I cannot see how a "100 year war" will sell on the McCain side. I am not sure that Mrs Clinton, gets the fact that she is not change. If Barack was not running she would be a shoe in, but...
Tomorrow night should be interesting.
.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:08 pm
by dl meckes
Bret Callentine wrote:nice job.
I can't wait to see the photos you get from this mornings town meeting with John McCain.
I wonder if the LO has a photographer who is a fan of McCain?
Did you take your camera?
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:16 pm
by Bret Callentine
Did you take your camera?
Sorry, but I could not attend.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:55 pm
by Phil Florian
Jim O'Bryan wrote:
The one thing I heard that bothered me was, "The war will cost over 1 Trillion Dollars. that money could have been better used..."
Well that money is borrowed money.
It could have best been used not borrowing it!
This is true, but one could argue that even one month of War spending put towards a more local initiative would have been better spent. One month of Iraq War spending would pay for nearly 3 years of the SCHIP program, for example. I think the cost to benefit ratio is better with the latter than the former. Even if you don't agree with the SCHIP program, one would think you can see the spending priorities in this country are out of wack right now.
So let's say we take 1/12 of each year of war spending since 2002 and we can essentially ensure health care for a qualifying child born today until he is adult. Period. The other 11/12 a year can go back to the World Bank or China or whomever we owe.
It is all about priorities. I want to vote for a guy who thinks that the war on terror won't be won by settling in for the next century.
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:23 pm
by Jim O'Bryan
Phil Florian wrote:So let's say we take 1/12 of each year of war spending since 2002 and we can essentially ensure health care for a qualifying child born today until he is adult. Period. The other 11/12 a year can go back to the World Bank or China or whomever we owe.
It is all about priorities. I want to vote for a guy who thinks that the war on terror won't be won by settling in for the next century.
Phil
An excellent program.
However
We simply cannot continue to borrow.
That's insane.
I have this feeling the Dutch own more of the USA than the Chinese, but not much more!
The Wolstein Center ready for the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton Democratic Presidential Debate.
.