Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:54 pm
hmmm, but would open discussion protect the right for someone to pressure another into not talking? What a conundrum.
Maybe the positive that comes out of such discussions prior to a plan being fully developed is that while they are at the table deciding they could actually have a finger on the pulse of Lakewood rather than proposing something that will go down like a lead balloon once announced. Sure there can be negatives of releasing a plan too soon but it's not like we're giving away our position to the enemy by voicing our concerns and clearly stating our expectations.
Some of what is being said on this topic is out there and maybe inappropriate or inaccurate but live by the sword, die by the sword. What should we expect when there are no moderators to guide the discussion and keep things relevant.
Maybe the positive that comes out of such discussions prior to a plan being fully developed is that while they are at the table deciding they could actually have a finger on the pulse of Lakewood rather than proposing something that will go down like a lead balloon once announced. Sure there can be negatives of releasing a plan too soon but it's not like we're giving away our position to the enemy by voicing our concerns and clearly stating our expectations.
Some of what is being said on this topic is out there and maybe inappropriate or inaccurate but live by the sword, die by the sword. What should we expect when there are no moderators to guide the discussion and keep things relevant.
