I think that I might be able to present another perspective here.
Schools can always improve. The problem would be "how" and on that note, there is, unfortunately, little agreement.
As a retired educator, having more than 30 years of classroom experience, I can tell you that there's historically been a huge disagreement in our country as to what constitutes a "good" education. Does education, for example, involve more inquiry, or indoctrination? Should education always cater to the "cream of the crop", or strive to serve all?
In the old days, and to a great extent still here in the Midwest, we continue to insist in our public schools that ALL STUDENTS be given the opportunity to grasp the brass ring. Here, we still tend to combine individual initiative with teamwork skills in order to develop well-rounded individuals who can have hope for their futures. We want all students to be able to maximize their potentials, and many do. Lakewood High School, for example, has successfully schooled many national leaders over the years in many fields.
Regarding the matter of relative high school experiences, I will say this: It would be very difficult for anyone to objectively compare their own high school experiences with those of others, simply because an individual would normally have no personal basis for comparisons.
Having graduated from, and having taught at Lakewood High School, as well as having taught at a number of other public and private schools over the course of many years, I would feel quite comfortable with stating that the quality of education being offered there is excellent.
I would in conclusion, simply suggest that a Lakewood High School learning experience, while being very well-balanced socially, educationally, and philosophically, would still depend very much on the attitude and motivation of the recipient, and that is very much as it should be.
You get out of life, or school, for that matter, (ANY school!) what you put into it.
Period.
