Are basketball hoops really that scary to people? When I was younger EVERY schoolyard and park had hoops and we all survived.
I love how she's so concerned about the impact on LCA - that's pretty telling.
Moderator: Jim O'Bryan
Peter Grossetti wrote:Councilmember-at-Large Monique Smith questions Lakewood Outdoor Basketball Committee's qualifications/planning/decisions and Mayor Summers' efforts to help. Her letter, in full, (source: onelakewood.com) to be presented at the September 4, 2012 City Council meeting:
Dear Members of Council:
We have received communications from the mayor informing us that his office has agreed to allow a private local advocacy group, The Lakewood Outdoor Basketball Committee (LOBC), to build a basketball court at Lakewood Park. We have not seen a written, formal plan for what has been proposed but some information has been shared over the course of the year including the recent communication that city funds may be used to complete the project that was originally proposed to be fully funded by LOBC. By way of this letter, I would like to request that the details of this private public partnership be documented in writing and shared with council and the public more formally so that we can all fully understand the plan and have the opportunity to share feedback on this unique partnership and parks initiative.
I am interested in understanding details such as:
- how the plan evolved?
- the projected timeframe for the project, including start date and be completion date
- a definition of goals and target population that we are attempting to serve (e.g. young children, teens, adults, boys, girls, Lakewood children, all of the above?)
- where the court (presumably a converted tennis court) will be located
- how and why a particular park was chosen as the location for this new program
- how and why the specific location of the court within the park was chosen over other locations
- how much community input was gathered on the choice of court location from those who live near the park and who regularly use nearby facilities such as Foster Pool, The Lakewood Catholic Academy pre-school playground, other tennis courts and the Kids Cove playground area
- what the hours of operation for the new court will be
- how and when the court will be supervised
- who will supervise, and how will they be trained or screened appropriately
- what the original financial commitment from LOBC was
- what the original financial commitment from the administration was
- a current projection of total costs to the city including labor, materials and funds
- whether other private groups may begin to submit proposals to build activity-specific facilities on public parkland
- Why this initiative has been chosen as a higher priority than other improvements that have been needed or requested by the public and council or outlined in the parks Master Plan
Because this information was not documented or measured in the pilot stage of the outdoor basketball court program at Kauffman Park, questions still remain for some members of the community about how to best manage an activity like this I believe that documentation of all expectations and commitments associated with this partnership will benefit everyone involved.
More broadly, I think this initiative presents an opportunity to think about the overall alignment of the city recreational programming efforts, currently managed by Lakewood Public Schools, and the Public Works/Parks planning efforts, currently managed by the city. I would like to take this opportunity to invite the Mayor Council and the Lakewood School Board to discuss the larger issue of how recreational programming can best be executed to meet our community current and future needs a subject that is so critical to families who are deciding which community to choose as their permanent home. For example, how can we work together to develop and supervise drop-in recreational activities such as outdoor basketball, in a way that maintains safe and successful programming for everyone, and what criteria should we use to prioritize initiatives such as new basketball courts when other improvements and investments may be wanted and needed by the community?
As our city continues to make itself more marketable and desirable by focusing on economic development and housing improvements, we should also take time to understand the recreational priorities and expectations that today’s residents and potential residents may have when choosing a community in which to live. Please refer this communication to an appropriate council committee to discuss the above questions about the city outdoor basketball plans with the Administration. I look forward to this discussion and to future conversations about parks and recreational program planning.
Sincerely
Monique Smith
Councilmember-at-Large
Scott Meeson wrote:Love the timing!!
Monique Smith wrote:The problem with the news of the backyard hen pilot program is that the mayor and his administration didn't involve city council in a single word of the discussions or the planning that they have apparently been having for quite a while about it. In fact, it's only because of the news that has been reported in the Observer that I even know about this pilot, and I'm a member of Lakewood city council. Pretty sad, eh?
To make it worse, when I reached out to the city's Director of Planning and Development several weeks ago to ask about the rumor that a pilot was in progress or being planned, the only response I received was that there was "no pilot"... and that was after more than one request for the information. So much for transparency and collaboration.
It breaks my heart to say this, because I once publicly supported the campaign of our current mayor and genuinely believed he would bring a very beneficial management style to city hall, but here's the thing: The mayor and some members of his administration are showing increasingly worrisome signs that they have no regard for council or some members of the public in Lakewood who may have opinions that differ from theirs. This backyard hen question is only one example in a pattern that I've been observing and have been worrying quite a bit about. I'm sure the mayor knows that there are members of council and the public who oppose the idea of backyard chickens in a city as densely populated and burdened with extremely serious housing issues (and few resources to handle them) as Lakewood. So how did he choose to deal with that potentially contentious issue? By completely excluding ALL of us from the discussion about this pilot. I regret that I have to take this complaint to the public rather than speaking with the mayor about it, but I feel that I'm left with no choice when members of council are excluded from these kinds of conversations at city hall.
One of my chief concerns about this pilot is that the mayor has said that housing is one of his top priorities, yet he has unilaterally chosen to increase the burden on our housing department and city resources by adding chickens to the residential landscape. It doesn't make sense to me. I'd like the opportunity to hear how it makes sense to him.
I sincerely respect the point of view and efforts of backyard hen supporters in Lakewood because I know that their intention is to provide a new means of making healthy, fresh food accessible to Lakewoodites. However, based on what I know of our city's housing situation, including issues that I see in my own neighborhood every day, and what our city is facing in terms of resource constraints, I can't support the inclusion of chickens in our residential landscape. Though our city has some similarities to other urban areas that allow backyard chickens, we also have many key differences and very unique challenges to manage. While the City of Cleveland may have some very appropriate conditions for raising backyard chickens, Lakewood simply does not.
Thank you to the publishers of the Observer and the readers of this forum for giving me a place to share my opinion on this. Unfortunately, I haven't had the same opportunity at city hall.
http://www.lakewoodobserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=10552
Danielle Masters wrote:which is really sad. I am really disappointed in Ms. Smith. As a parent of kids who don't play basketball I have been able to keep an eye on the goings on of LOBC. This is the second time I remember that she has pleaded ignorance to the goings on of Lakewood, last time it was about chickens. Is she paying attention to Lakewood at all?
Stephanie Toole wrote:Yet again, keeping ‘those people’ out of our parks was her concern. I asked her if this would mean we would also be checking the ID’s of all adults as well? That the police would be checking the ID’s of all park visitors engaged in activities other than basketball correct? If we are checking the ID’s of kids on the basketball court than I would expect the police to check the ID's of people picnicking, playing baseball, folks attending The 4th of July Fireworks, swimming at our pools, watching Friday Night Flicks, and the skateboarders just to name a few. On second thought, I told her why don’t we just put a gate at the 117th border and check ID’s there. Stop them before they enter.
Justine Cooper wrote:I do want to point out that teaching in a residential facility last year in Cleveland, I saw students in the system, most from horribly broken homes and many with no homes. Their educational levels were scattered and often their emotional and behavioral growth incredibly stunted. But when they got on the basketball court, they were tranformed. The kids who were rivals because of different neighborhoods forgot all that when they played. It was like everything to them. And if I had a nickel for every time one of these tough street kids turned to make sure I saw them make their long shot I would have enough to buy more than one brick.